NDlurker

6 ms·

1.
by NDlurker 5d ago
Either it's truth or it's something about the human mind/experience that gets them to the same ideas.
2.
by NDlurker 6d ago
I experienced that after smoking salvia
3.
by NDlurker 6d ago
That's not what happened with r/conspiracy users getting banned in other forums. Yeah I guess it has its place but that feature has been mostly misused from what I've seen.
4.
by NDlurker 6d ago
I wouldn't even look at what other communities someone is participating in
5.
by NDlurker 6d ago
Yes, but some of them aren't. There are instances of people being banned because they participated in another sub. Instances of people being banned for criticizing Israel. It wouldn't be so much of an issue if it was like back in
6.
by NDlurker 6d ago
Check out this thread I made. It quickly moved to the top of the front page but then somehow moved down to like page 3, even though it had more upvotes and discussion than all or most of the other threads posted that day. https:/&#x2F
7.
by NDlurker 6d ago
Some of the moderation is just banning people with differing opinions.
8.
by NDlurker 8d ago
You have no morals. I can't comment further or I will be banned from this board.
9.
by NDlurker 8d ago
If I were to fire a gun randomly at an apartment building and kill people, but my intent was to only do property damage, does that mean I didn't commit murder? Intent does not matter when the outcome is people dying.
10.
by NDlurker 8d ago
Was a war crime and the perpetrators should spend their lives in prison.
11.
by NDlurker 9d ago
Nina Hartley has got to have some of the craziest stories. I'd love to see her talk about all the weird stuff she's seen/been involved with.
12.
by NDlurker 9d ago
The other thing I remember was California fakes folding in half and not breaking
13.
by NDlurker 9d ago
Ok! Why aren't citizenship swaps allowed?
14.
by NDlurker 9d ago
I love Australia. Amazing country. Great people. I'd move back in an instant if given the opportunity. As an American, I always felt welcome there, but haven't been there since 2016. It'll be interesting seeing how attitudes
15.
by NDlurker 10d ago
I love Negativland. Very interesting use of samples. Their album with Chumbawumba is really cool
16.
by NDlurker 11d ago
Cool! I had no idea
17.
by NDlurker 11d ago
Literally hurt my eyes. Didn't make it past the first paragraph
18.
by NDlurker 12d ago
I want to wear 2 of these bands and have multi touch AR. In thinking like pinch to zoom for reality.
19.
by NDlurker 13d ago
Haha https://youtu.be/KUXb7do9C-w
20.
by NDlurker 14d ago
I was specifically talking about photos and videos of people who have been murdered or died in accidents. Those photos should not be shared for entertainment just the same as photos of children being raped should not be shared for entertain
21.
by NDlurker 14d ago
Same. That was my introduction to telnet
22.
by NDlurker 14d ago
Yeah that's disgusting
23.
by NDlurker 14d ago
Definition of gore would be something like photos/videos of people suffering from graphic bodily harm shared for entertainment purposes. Medical stuff shared in a professional setting is different. Crime scene photos shared during an i
24.
by NDlurker 14d ago
CNN covered the Daniel Pearl story just fine without showing the video. There's no good reason to share a murder video for entertainment just like there's no good reason to share a rape video for entertainment.
25.
by NDlurker 15d ago
Rape is a very common crime. Doesn't mean it's ok to film and share it. So why is it ok to share murder videos?
26.
by NDlurker 15d ago
I'm at work and also don't like typing on my phone. I replied with my reasoning now
27.
by NDlurker 15d ago
The argument is that the child is revictimized with each viewing. Wouldn't it be the same for a murder victim? The argument is that distributing child sex abuse material creates a demand for more of it. Wouldn't it be the same for
28.
by NDlurker 15d ago
I get downvoted whenever I bring this up but nobody has a good argument on why it should remain legal.
29.
by NDlurker 15d ago
Off topic, but gore should be treated the same way legally
30.
by NDlurker 15d ago
Huh? That's how quotation marks are used here in the US too

More ›