Munksgaard

8 ms·

61.
by Munksgaard 2y ago
I use typst to generate PDFs on the fly in my sass-platform. The only other reliable ways I could find to do that was by using LaTeX (slow) or various WebKit-based tools (also slow, and in carious states of unmaintained/deprecated). It
62.
Rust in Linux Revisited(drewdevault.com)
162 points by Munksgaard 2y ago|160 comments
63.
Against Names(steveklabnik.com)
2 points by Munksgaard 2y ago|0 comments
64.
by Munksgaard 2y ago
Here's a direct link for anyone who, like me, would be interested in reading the original article: https://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/pubs/BFPRT73.pdf That's an impressive list of authors, for sure.
65.
The European Union must keep funding free software(pad.public.cat)
6 points by Munksgaard 2y ago|0 comments
66.
by Munksgaard 2y ago
Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Lisp the original version of this?
67.
by Munksgaard 2y ago
Your coffee machine uses AI to continually enhance your coffee experience based on the mineral contents of the water, the specific beans being used, your personal tastes and various other dynamic factors.
68.
OriginAI - Build custom enterprise software using GenAI(theorigin.ai)
2 points by Munksgaard 2y ago|0 comments
69.
by Munksgaard 2y ago
Have you looked at Futhark?
70.
Reading more Ursula Le Guin (2019)(theoutline.com)
178 points by Munksgaard 2y ago|187 comments
71.
Mycorrhiza Wiki(mycorrhiza.wiki)
2 points by Munksgaard 2y ago|0 comments
72.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
I've definitely heard variants of "the market will decide what is fraud" from people that I know in real life.
73.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
Reminds me of https://motherfrunker.ca/fsd/
74.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
Out of curiosity, what is the margin on their service income vs. their hardware income?
75.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
That's a bold claim, do you have any evidence to back that up with? To be clear, I agree that it could be a reason, along with a multitude of others. I think that discerning which is the most substantial reason (if any such exist) is h
76.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
> Single exit, though, means no "break", or "continue" for loops, and no early returns from functions. Sounds like pretty standard functional programming a la Standard ML or Haskell, or am I missing something?
77.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
Perhaps I am unfamiliar with this usage of the word horde, but is it possible that you mean hoard?
78.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
I don't like curly braces, but I don't let that decide which programming languages I use.
79.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
Utilitarianism is not the only moral framework.
80.
Book Illustrations Using MetaPost(habr.com)
2 points by Munksgaard 3y ago|0 comments
81.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
> Is Truth Social basically paying Trump's ongoing legal costs? Would that surprise anyone, Truth users included?
82.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
> When you refactor, make a change, or try to add new functionality, and end up fighting the type checker. That's friction to change you are experiencing and that experience is optional. I'm not sure exactly what you're sa
83.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
Yes. The Basis library does not live up to today's standards. Which is of course no surprise, given that it hasn't changed since the 90s.
84.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
The notable thing here is of course the new HIP backend for Futhark, which turned out to be surprisingly easy to implement and resulted in significant performance improvements in AMD GPU execution, specifically when performing scans.
85.
Futhark 0.25.3 released – New HIP Back end(futhark-lang.org)
3 points by Munksgaard 3y ago|1 comments
86.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
> but it’s simply not rude to suggest reading docs would bring clarity It's pretty rude to assume/insinuate that I haven't read the documentation just because you misunderstood my initial concern.
87.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
Your point is rendered moot by the fact that `in` is allowed in guards. See my other response as well.
88.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
> Because it is not meant to be a guard—it cannot further empower a function head and pattern match and be optimized and/or inlined by the compiler. Simple as that. First of all, that's not an explanation, that is handwaving. T
89.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
Then explain to me, purely by referencing the Elixir documentation, why URI.char_reserved?/1 is not instead called URI.is_char_reserved/1 such that I can use it in a guard. There's nothing intuitive about memorizing dozens of
90.
by Munksgaard 3y ago
There's no need to be rude. My point is that it is not obvious, given some arbitrary value and some property to test for, whether that property can be expressed using a guard or not.

More ›