Miner49er

12 ms·

91.
by Miner49er 2y ago
This is simply not true. You don't need Amazon Prime at all, those games are streamed on Twitch for free. You also only need some of these services for a month or two. Finally, you can get the network games for free with a TV antenna.
92.
by Miner49er 2y ago
I don't think this stops it. The NPVIC seems to have accounted for this. It is discussed here: https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/bill-text "Popular votes can, however, only be counted from non-member state
93.
by Miner49er 2y ago
> What other forms of semi-stable functional "socialism" are there? Cooperatives. This article we're discussing here is advocating for socialism, it's just not using that word.
94.
by Miner49er 2y ago
> Individual companies being owned by their employees isn't socialism. Actually, yes, this is the literal definition of socialism. It's workers owning the means of production.
95.
by Miner49er 2y ago
The lack of urgency and awareness around this baffles me. The death of Firefox means the death of the open web, but it seems like very few people care.
96.
by Miner49er 2y ago
Get-help get-childitem
97.
by Miner49er 2y ago
True, anarchism has such a broad definition that some anarchists will be unhappy with any implementation. I consider myself an anarchist and I think federalism can be an important part of it. You'll also find that many people involved
98.
by Miner49er 2y ago
> So everybody for themselves, ok. This has nothing to do with anarchism. Anarchism is simply organizing society to have as little hierarchy as possible.
99.
by Miner49er 2y ago
> At least with respect to the President’s exercise of his core constitutional powers, this immunity must be absolute. As for his remaining official actions, he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity.
100.
by Miner49er 2y ago
It very much is if it's done by commanding the military to do it. Maybe not so much if a President did it themselves.
101.
by Miner49er 2y ago
Anything laid out as a Presidential power in the Constitution is definitely an "official act". What is left for definition is everything else, from my understanding.
102.
by Miner49er 2y ago
They are partially defined, and the example given is part of the partial definition.
103.
by Miner49er 2y ago
How can it be an illegal order when this decision makes all of the Presidents "official actions" legal?
104.
by Miner49er 2y ago
I don't see how. The President has immunity when acting with powers granted from the Constitution. Commanding the military is one of those powers. The majority opinion also specifically says motives can't be considered. So they ar
105.
by Miner49er 2y ago
Well no, technically the president can use the military to stop impeachment. That would be considered an "official act" and they would be immune.
106.
by Miner49er 2y ago
> but it is not allowing them to commit crimes with impunity Well it kind of does, because the president has the power to stop impeachment from ever happening in the first place, if they're willing to command the military to.
107.
by Miner49er 2y ago
It happened under Obama and nobody cared. I think it is definitely something that could be considered an "official act".
108.
by Miner49er 2y ago
This is true for gluten free subs of foods that aren't normally GF, yes. But GF mustard, for example, isn't any more expensive then non-GF mustard.
109.
by Miner49er 2y ago
Exactly, most commenters here don't seem to understand this or understand how FDA allergen labelling works. Bimbo would be fine if they just used a "may contains" or actually added sesame to their products (although the FDA d
110.
by Miner49er 2y ago
I have celiac, I buy a lot of GF foods. There are tons of foods labeled gluten free that aren't marketed as gluten free, and cost as much as normal food because they are normal food that's labeled GF. Only certain ingredients need
111.
by Miner49er 2y ago
This is not the case at all. It's done for gluten free foods. Gluten free foods have to be under 20ppm to be called GF, and there are many gluten free foods out there. Even some made on the same equipment as gluten containing foods (ju
112.
by Miner49er 2y ago
Gluten is an allergen for people with celiac, just not IgE-mediated. Celiac shouldn't be classified with lactose intolerance, it's much more serious, arguably more dangerous then even IgE-mediated allergies.
113.
by Miner49er 2y ago
No they aren't. They don't like it, but they haven't done anything about it.
114.
by Miner49er 2y ago
It's not forced to serve markets. They are just not allowed to say their products contain sesame when they don't. They are mislabeling their products, and the FDA's job is to ensure products are labeled accurately.
115.
by Miner49er 2y ago
The food manufacturer is supposed to follow GMP and prevent allergens for being in foods they shouldn't be in.
116.
by Miner49er 2y ago
It's an interesting idea, but the end result would probably be less options for people with allergies (unless they risk foods that appear to be safe, but lack the label.) We already have this type of labelling for gluten free foods, an
117.
Meet VIC, Wyoming's First AI Candidate Running for Cheyenne Mayor(cowboystatedaily.com)
2 points by Miner49er 2y ago|0 comments
118.
Artificial intelligence is running for mayor of Cheyenne(oilcity.news)
17 points by Miner49er 2y ago|9 comments
119.
by Miner49er 2y ago
We can't reciprocate, because Americans have rights that the Chinese don't have. By reciprocating we weaken our rights.
120.
by Miner49er 2y ago
I'm not really spinning anything. This is likely the defense TikTok will be using in court. The 1st amendment covers the right to receive information, and it's funny you bring up propaganda because it has even been ruled it covers

More ›