Mike_12345

14 ms·

91.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
I agree with that. The Transformer architecture does not satisfy the Markov property by formal definition. ChatGPT is not a Markov chain. However the Turing machine which is executing the algorithm does satisfy the Markov property. So you&#
92.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
So basically you're saying it's just an algorithm running on a computer? Yes I agree with that.
93.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Then you don't understand what Wolfram Alpha is capable of. It is far superior to language models for mathematics. No comparison. That's why they are integrating it.
94.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Is there a consensus? I haven't been able to find much else via Google search. At that level of theorizing I wouldn't expect any consensus, only original ideas from a few elite researchers.
95.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Then by that reasoning everything in the physical world is a Markov chain, right? That is like saying that any deterministic process in time is a Markov chain. A tennis ball in flight is a Markov chain since the state at t is a function of
96.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
So the consensus is that consciousness is computable by a Turing machine?
97.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
That is not a risk. There are already many examples of questions and answers to engineering/physics/mathematical problems in the existing training set. The issue is that GPT is fundamentally not suited for mathematical reasoning,
98.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
But all of the answers were correct and useful, and GPT-4 was perfect. Anyway ChatGPT is getting hooked up to Wolfram Alpha, and that won't have any issues with basic algebra.
99.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
This is about GPT-4 calling Wolfram Alpha to do the math. Wolfram Alpha is not a language model.
100.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
GPT-4 disagrees: GPT-3.5, like its predecessor GPT-3, is not a Markov chain. GPT-3.5 is based on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture, which is a type of neural network known as a Transformer. Transformers use self-atte
101.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Answer from GPT-4: "This question seems to be intentionally nonsensical or is using unfamiliar terminology. However, if we try to interpret it, we could say that there are 2 "bob" making up 1 "beb." In this case, th
102.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
I must have hallucinated that. GPT-3 has 96 layers but they haven't disclosed the number of layers in GPT-4.
103.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
The question is whether consciousness is computable. Can a Turing machine be conscious? Probably not. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg25634130-100-roger-pe... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXgq
104.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
GPT-4 is often overhyped and underhyped because few really understand it. It's not a Markov Chain or a fancy text predictor. It's a ~200 layer neural network that models a vast hierarchy of concepts through language. It has emerge
105.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
If you took that literally, and actually believe this is a real separate individual, and believe this is their real voice, then I don't know what to say to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=effHrj0qmwk This is how i
106.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
LOL. To be fair, his behaviour is extremely weird so I don't blame you for being confused by his insane bullshit, as I was at first.
107.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Google it "ThinkPad linux driver reverse engineered" or "lenovo linux driver reverse engineered" Power management, I2C devices, touchpad, touchscreen, audio, WiFi, bluetooth, etc. Many things besides the GPU. Maybe some
108.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Yeah so that's called a joke.
109.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
> He's been clear that he's not Asahi Lina You cannot be this gullible. "Asahi Lina" is a pseudonym for Marcan.
110.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
On Asahi Linux at work?
111.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
The topic here is Asahi Linux. Obviously external displays work on MacOS.
112.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
> but it is substantially open No it is not. I'm amazed that people just don't get this simple fact. The drivers were reverse engineered. ThinkPad is not an open platform. It contains some Intel and AMD stuff that is open, but
113.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
>You contradict yourself by praising Apple for keeping standard features while deriding Lenovo for doing the same thing. Putting words in my mouth. I never praised Apple and I never derided Lenovo. I am simply stating the facts. I am try
114.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
> but compared to the Macs, it has a much stronger claim to openness. False. Lenovo hardware contains a lot of proprietary undocumented parts that required reverse engineering to get working on Linux/BSD. The parts that didn't
115.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Battery, BIOS, touchpad, power management, touch screen, fingerprint scanner, Nvidia GPU, etc. Believe it or not, they sell hardware with Linux OOTB thanks to others reverse engineering their proprietary subsystems.
116.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Well supported by mainline kernels, thanks to reverse engineering undocumented proprietary Lenovo hardware. ThinkPads contain other components besides the GPU. Apple is not in the business of selling GPUs to other hardware vendors and the f
117.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
ThinkPad also has proprietary undocumented subsystems that are reverse engineered to work on Linux. Such double standards versus Apple.
118.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
That was 26 years ago and it is irrelevant.
119.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
It didn't make them worse. Highest market cap on the planet.
120.
by Mike_12345 4y ago
Likewise it is possible to write optimally performing Java code if you know how what what's going on behind the scenes. https://lmax-exchange.github.io/disruptor/disruptor.html

More ›