Michael_Groom

5 ms·

1.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
3blue1brown also has some nice visual explanations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_0yfvm0UoU
2.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
You might want to check out a very interesting non-linear spinor theory[1] which contains a chapter on dark matter and dark energy analytically explaining the formation and inner structure, as well as the ratio of dark matter and dark energ
3.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
Interesting assumption from skimming the pdf. Happy to hear your true thoughts once you actually read and fully understand it.
4.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
Side-Remark, page 17: http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2014-05...
5.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
Well than these are the criteria you choose not giving it a shot, fair enough.
6.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
Well “rupture” in this context simply describes the rupture of the massive short ranged repulsive boson G5 leading to the rupture of the neutrino leading to the reproduction cascade (see p153) leading to the proportions of normal matter&#x2
7.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
No references. The fundamental idea is based on the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg. Anything else is new. This theory solves the problems, Heisenberg introduced with his equation by eleminating the coupling consta
8.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
The downvote means: "I cannot tell whats wrong with the theory b/c I didnt even read it. I don't know what a spinor is, nor am I familiar with the concept of point splitting. I dont even understand why the coupling constant i
9.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
The visuals are great indeed. Same is your reading speed. Now improve your level of understanding text as well while being distracted from beautiful visuals.
10.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
Would you mind showing me the "wrong definition of a prime" in this manila envelope?
11.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
I do, we are talking about a non-linear spinor dynamic here, omitting the gamma algebra inherited by Dirac spinors. This algebra is well known and omitted as it would render the text confusing indeed as spinor products are of relatively hig
12.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
No, the fundamental equation 1.1 and 1.2 is structurally similar to the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg, except for two significant differences: 1) 1.1, 1.2 does not contain a dimensionful coupling constant 2) It c
13.
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
Read this theory, it contains everything the standard model is incapable of explaining, i.e. mass, distribution of normal matter/antimatter dark matter and dark energy after the big bang, decrease of dark matter, increase of dark energ
14.
by Michael_Groom 9y ago
You might want to check out a very interesting non-linear spinor theory[1] which contains a chapter on dark matter and dark energy analytically explaining the formation and inner structure, as well as the ratio of dark matter and dark energ