3 ms·
No references. The fundamental idea is based on the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg. Anything else is new. This theory solves the prob
by Michael_Groom 8y ago
No references. The fundamental idea is based on the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg. Anything else is new. This theory solves the problems, Heisenberg introduced with his equation by eleminating the coupling constant l (dim psi = -1/2 hence not observable instead of -3/2) and adding the point split on the right side of the equation which is a consequence of the differential operator on the left side (dx is equivalent to the point split). The rest naturally follows from this fundamental equation.
- perl4ever 8y agoFrom skimming the pdf, I didn't notice any conventional equations such as one would find in a paper by someone like Heisenberg. If there were any, could you point one out? Edit/post script: I also don't see that the word "algebra" is mentioned in the document at all. By comparison the Wikipedia page on spinors uses the word "algebra" 116 times. That seems odd if this theory is based on a deep understanding of spinors.
- Michael_Groom 8y agoSide-Remark, page 17: http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2014-05-26_GDE-en_norbert-winter_the-principle-of-greatest-simplicity.pdf http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2014-05...
- perl4ever 8y agoThis is not the same document as originally linked, and regardless, it doesn't cite a source. What's with that?