MarceColl

9 ms·

31.
by MarceColl 1y ago
well, it takes around 20 minutes to get an invite, so hardly a problem if you prefer only tech articles
32.
by MarceColl 1y ago
The rules are very clear on when those are used though, you are not really arguing the original point imo. What are the dialectical variations in "ll" and "c"?
33.
by MarceColl 1y ago
I use a dedicated hetzner server (12 cores 64gb ram) for 60 euros with postgres
34.
by MarceColl 1y ago
in my case it runs on a good old server. > So your Python code without modidication can benefit from it. that's not completely true though, say you have two python processes, you need to solve yourself how they communicate, HTTP? a
35.
by MarceColl 1y ago
So now you need several servers, an orchestrator, tons of YAML, arcane and terrible error messages and a devops team to kind of match the BEAM? That's... not a good look
36.
by MarceColl 1y ago
Yet another Japanese learning app[0], but something that is very useful to me, so I hope it will be useful for others as well. I struggle to deal with comprehensible input that interests me at this time. The best way to immerse yourself is
37.
by MarceColl 1y ago
That's insane, my dad had cancer 3 years ago, and here in Spain we didn't even think about it (beyond of course the terrible situation). If you also want private insurance it will cost a youngish small family (like mine) 150EUR&#x
38.
by MarceColl 1y ago
AI definitely helps here (and it's the direction I'm going), although to start exploring the space in a way that makes sense to me (and because it's a problem I have), I've reduced the space into these steps: * I wan
39.
by MarceColl 1y ago
It's tricky I think, I think it comes down to specialized tools for different systems. I'm building a tool for Japanese in this direction. But of course it doesn't generalize to everything since the content and context extrac
40.
by MarceColl 1y ago
I have no problem with technological assistance in human lives in most cases. I'm just pointing out the incredibly anti-social behaviour of wanting to outsource socializing. What conspiracy theory? I didn't say anything about AI d
41.
by MarceColl 1y ago
> and mingle with other AI's to find possible business or romantic connections for us, all automatically I thought the top post was already depressing, but this is a whole new level of psychopathic tech-bro mindset. Interesting also
42.
by MarceColl 1y ago
The day just started for me and I'm already depressed by this
43.
by MarceColl 1y ago
In the spirit of being minimally viable you could just have that in the filename and sort it before generating.
44.
by MarceColl 1y ago
For me Mutatzione[0] was incredible and appeared at a time in my life where I was in a very dark place. I discovered one saturday morning, bought it and played it the whole day. It's short, it's sweet, the art is beautiful. It&#x2
45.
by MarceColl 1y ago
Common Lisp, which is what I use, is not really a functional oriented language. I'd say the above is okay in CL.
46.
by MarceColl 1y ago
to be a bit more precise, everytime you have a name in common lisp that is already a symbol. But it will get evaluated. If its as the first item of an evaluated list it will be looked at in the function name space, if elsewhere it will be l
47.
by MarceColl 1y ago
that's correct, but its not that it denotes a symbol as a different function of ', its the same function. Turn code into data. That's all symbols are (in CL at least). For example in a quoted list, you dont need to quote the
48.
by MarceColl 1y ago
I think it really depends, in Common Lisp for example I don't think that's the case: (progn (do-something) (do-something-else) (do-a-third-thing)) The only case where it's a bit different and took some time
49.
by MarceColl 1y ago
It's not really implicit though, the first element of a list that is evaluated is always a function. So (FUN 1 2) is an explicit function call. The problem is that it doesn't look like C-like languages, not that it's not exp
50.
by MarceColl 1y ago
As an outsider, none of what you said matters one bit to us. All seems fairly reasonable by "world" standards. When your universities stopped being the envy of the world was when attending them meant hundreds of thousands of dolla
51.
by MarceColl 1y ago
It's probably that ls in the other shell is the builtin instead of the binary, when strace runs ls -U it does run the binary and not the shell builtin. tcsh must also delegate to the binary instead of a builtin, or their builtin is fas
52.
by MarceColl 2y ago
I implemented something similar for Common Lisp: https://github.com/marcecoll/rekishi The idea was that you don't have files, just functions that you can bring in and out of scope while editing. You have branches
53.
by MarceColl 2y ago
Another thing I wanted to do is bring a bit of a lower level programming. Closer to a Zachtronics game, where you have a simplified microcontroler-like architecture and a nicely written datasheet-like manual you can print and browse at your
54.
by MarceColl 2y ago
Yeah, part of the idea came from Screeps. However I had a problem with Screeps and it's the onboarding. It feels like you have to build a lot of code just to start playing. Which is it's own niche of course, but I wanted the onboa
55.
by MarceColl 2y ago
I’m a big fan of everything Uxn related. The architecture is fun to work with, and unlike most low-level architectures it is very event driven making interactive programs quite easy to make. I’m exploring building a game around it (not in i
56.
by MarceColl 2y ago
Not sure when you read this, but I can tell you that two years ago it was VERY slow. I used it for a game and I had to redo it in lua some months later because it was a big bottleneck. I don't have more up to date information.
57.
by MarceColl 2y ago
It shows what they want to show, which is mostly how much of the world books they have. Hierarchical has nothing to do with it.
58.
by MarceColl 2y ago
that's fine, what Im saying is that the above workflow is idealized and you have to do a lot more things overtime. If you look at the happy path it looks similar. With the unhappy path instead of keeping stashes and commiting trash the
59.
by MarceColl 2y ago
yeah, you could do this, but it gets kind of annoying in my experience. However it is another solution, most of what you do in jj you can do in git, its just more convenient
60.
by MarceColl 2y ago
that's what I used to do, now I just use jj and I dont need to either keep a set of stashes nor create superfluous commits based on when I decided to change branches

More ›