3 ms·

I think it really depends, in Common Lisp for example I don't think that's the case: (progn (do-something) (do-something-else) (do-a-third-thing)

I think it really depends, in Common Lisp for example I don't think that's the case: (progn (do-something) (do-something-else) (do-a-third-thing)) The only case where it's a bit different and took some time for me to adjust was that adding bindings adds an indent level. (let ((a 12) (b 14)) (do-something a) (do-something-else b) (setf b (do-third-thing a b))) It's still mostly top-bottom, left to right. Clojure is quite a bit different, but it's not a property of lisps itself I'd say. I have a hard time coming up with examples usually so I'm open to examples of being wrong here.

fc417fc802 1y ago
Your example isn't a very functional code style though so I don't know that I'd consider it to be idiomatic. Generally code written in a functional style ends up indented many layers deep. Below is a quick (and quite tame) example from one of the introductory guides for Racket. My code often ends up much deeper. Consider what it would look like if one of the cond branches contained a nested cond. (define (start request) (define a-blog (cond [(can-parse-post? (request-bindings request)) (cons (parse-post (request-bindings request)) BLOG)] [else BLOG])) (render-blog-page a-blog request)) https://docs.racket-lang.org/continue/index.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/continue/index.html
- MarceColl 1y ago
  Common Lisp, which is what I use, is not really a functional oriented language. I'd say the above is okay in CL.
  - fc417fc802 1y ago
    I must have missed that memo. Sure it's remarkably flexible and simultaneously accommodates other approaches, but most of the code I see in the wild leans fairly heavily into a functional style. I posted a CL link in an adjacent comment. Here's an example that mixes in a decent amount of procedural code that I'd consider idiomatic. https://github.com/ghollisjr/cl-ana/blob/master/hdf-table/hdf-table.lisp https://github.com/ghollisjr/cl-ana/blob/master/hdf-table/hd...

fc417fc802 1y ago

Your example isn't a very functional code style though so I don't know that I'd consider it to be idiomatic. Generally code written in a functional style ends up indented many layers deep. Below is a quick (and quite tame) example from one of the introductory guides for Racket. My code often ends up much deeper. Consider what it would look like if one of the cond branches contained a nested cond. (define (start request) (define a-blog (cond [(can-parse-post? (request-bindings request)) (cons (parse-post (request-bindings request)) BLOG)] [else BLOG])) (render-blog-page a-blog request)) https://docs.racket-lang.org/continue/index.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/continue/index.html

MarceColl 1y ago
Common Lisp, which is what I use, is not really a functional oriented language. I'd say the above is okay in CL.
- fc417fc802 1y ago
  I must have missed that memo. Sure it's remarkably flexible and simultaneously accommodates other approaches, but most of the code I see in the wild leans fairly heavily into a functional style. I posted a CL link in an adjacent comment. Here's an example that mixes in a decent amount of procedural code that I'd consider idiomatic. https://github.com/ghollisjr/cl-ana/blob/master/hdf-table/hdf-table.lisp https://github.com/ghollisjr/cl-ana/blob/master/hdf-table/hd...