Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Lutger
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
271.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
> That's mitigated by the lack of autoloading so you can learn the structure of the project by looking at the import statements at the top of the files. Unfortunately that means that you have to waste time by writing those imports.
272.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
I've worked with them both, although Rails has been a while. Some things that stand out to me: Rails has pretty good code generation. If I want just want to get started and add a birthday field to the settings page, I can run a short o
273.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Exactly. Walter Bright also used to be a lone hero - he isn't anymore. But some habits stick of course. Also the languages he writes in might not have the best formatters. I am old enough to have experienced the not so good formatters
274.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
I highly recommend everyone who wonders why people do this to read the 'Conspiracy Theory Handbook'. Unlike what the title suggests, it is a very brief primer into the psychological research done by Cook and others on conspiracy t
275.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
> That’s changing the goalposts. You complain about that, but proceed to doing it yourself, and you don't even address the point unlike the person you responded to. > It was like trying to prevent a cold or the flu from spreading
276.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Respectfully, I believe you are in the wrong here. Covid and climate science denial can be strengthened by having a 'discussion'. This is because conspiracy thinking is actually immune to evidence. The denialist will subvert your
277.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Any sources or data to back that up? Or is this just your own hypothesis you came up with yourself? There is an enormous body of knowledge proving vaccines did reduce transmissions, you can easily find them online. So a claim that goes coun
278.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
I believe ads work by making a brand name familiar, which helps you recognize it in the sea of information. And that makes it automatically somewhat more attractive and reputably. You can be entirely unaware of this and it still works. Mayb
279.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Not sure if I would call hardcoded settings in the sourcecode configuration - they are just constants. The primary benefit of configuration is the ability of changing the behavior of software without having to rebuild, redeploy, redistribut
280.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
That was exactly what ritzaco said (not me): > If I want to copy FAANG or another startup, and set up an infinitely scalable queue-based architecture, I can find dozens of high quality guides, tutorials, white papers etc, showing me exac
281.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
This happens when there are thousands other simple things and a lot of complicated things. When your devs are stretched, you sort by priority and I can tell you this is not that important.
282.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
This is all true, important and often misunderstood, but beside the point made to which you reply. There's a (sort of) objective trade-off to be made, but another dimension is how familiar you are with the solution and/or how quic
283.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
We use Unleash. There are many things you can do with feature flags and Unleash helps with a lot of them. However, my feeling is 80% of the value comes from 20% of the features. Even a much simpler system provides a ton of benefit. For me,
284.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
ymmv and this evidence is anecdotal of course, but our team has used linux on framework laptops now for more than a year and we experience way, way less issues than on windows. I can't remember the last time I had a problem with linux
285.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Your perception of desktop linux and its creators sounds like it is based on a cursory trial from at least ten years ago, frankly it sounds quite disrespectful to the makers.
286.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
I agree too. That distinction is clear and useful. I'm interested in creating a plausible-natural agricultural ecosystem, aka a food forest. Such a system draws more criticism from ecologists, probably because where I live almost all o
287.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
> we are just accelerating nature's own process That is well put and also exactly my point. However, you are accelerating something, so there is an intervention. For some people this doesn't count as natural! The word 'j
288.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
This comment boggles my mind. There are hundreds of developers just employed by gitlab, and likely many thousands of contributors and a multiple of active users voicing their (probably often contradictory) wishes. You want to track this in
289.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Hedging your bet is one part, another big one is creating habitat for predators. Pests often arise in monocultures because there just isn't any suitable habitat for the organisms that eat them. A part of that habitat is food, so ironic
290.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Well, yes and no. Yes, in the sense that 'nature' is what organisms learned in millions of years and the emergent processes of the ecosystems in which they 'learned' things. And because this is so vastly complex, we ofte
291.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
In some tree monocultures, you can just see the soil is covered with layers of organic matter that just isn't decomposing fast enough. This is because there isn't the diversity in the soil food web required to process it, reflecti
292.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Oh my, I don't care much for blackcurrent, but absolutely love redcurrant and whitecurrant. The best one is a pink cultivar. I tell you, the pines aren't worth it.
293.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
We do? Where?
294.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Nah, the mirror image of this would probably be a meetup for management type folks, with talks praising the efficacy of NOT interrupting your team when doing work requiring deep attention, let them only come to the office when it is really
295.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
A large number of developers never master the basics, that is true. But more interestingly, absolutely zero programmers can write a good amount of code that is free of bugs. If your road to safety is bugfree code, it will end up in an accid
296.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
It is quite likely this would have been solved by a good automated deployment process. However, it is also quite likely that at some point a human error would creep into either the automated deployment process itself, or be 100% correctly d
297.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
We are seeing adoption very quickly though, and we might be able to make them profitable. It is too soon to tell.
298.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
A lot of these methods aren't easy to scale (yet) and depend on the outstanding expertise of individuals. There are also various incentives and circumstances that work against it, depending on the country where you live: - you can'
299.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Are you saying people like Shepard, Fukuoka and Götsch are amateurs? Do you even know who these people are?
300.
▲
by
Lutger
3y ago
Herenboeren doesn't have to compete with commercial farming directly. It only has to be good enough that participants are willing to join, which they are. So the overall deal needs to be attractive enough. And we have several important
More ›