4 ms·
It is quite likely this would have been solved by a good automated deployment process. However, it is also quite likely that at some point a human error would c
by Lutger 3y ago
It is quite likely this would have been solved by a good automated deployment process. However, it is also quite likely that at some point a human error would creep into either the automated deployment process itself, or be 100% correctly deployed into production.
At that point, if the error is as serious, Knight would still gave gone bankrupt since they had no way to mitigate these failure conditions.
Being 100% free of bugs is just not a viable way to end up with safe systems.
- movedx 3y agoAll processes are fallible, but some are less so than others because we've automated a large part of them. DevOps, and CI/CD, would have prevented Knight's issues 100%.