Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LordDragonfang
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
> I'm sure that legislators could put the principle down in a much clearer way. That's precisely the problem here. You're "sure" that a problem you don't actually fully understand is trivially solved in a si
32.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Depending on how you ( you specifically) are defining "fully stated": 1. This is very literally what already happens, it's called a EULA. 2. In practice this means you are required to personally come to the customer's h
33.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
If you have a race condition, "correct action" is to solve that, because you shouldn't be papering over server-side bugs with client-side Javascript (and yes, it's a bug, because I shouldn't see an error page if I p
34.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Yeah, I clocked it as AI the moment I read "Here is the uncomfortable part". Pangram detects it as 100% AI-generated: https://www.pangram.com/history/c410d4b4-abfd-4ca0-b52d-db0d...
35.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Hey, just FYI to everyone: Even though this article is conveying good (and useful) information, it seems to be completely AI-generated. Pangram clocks it as 100% AI: https://www.pangram.com/history/c410d4b4-abfd-4ca0-b5
36.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Yeah, I clocked it as AI the moment I read "Here is the uncomfortable part". FWIW, Pangram detects it as 100% AI-generated. https://www.pangram.com/history/c410d4b4-abfd-4ca0-b52d-db0d...
37.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Whether or not someone is entitled to something has very little bearing on whether someone believes they are entitled to something (and are willing to waste everyone's time to make a stink about it). Having clear rules to point to,
38.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Touché
39.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Considering that "sentience" has enough "philosophical leeway" that it's just as reasonable to assert that LLMs are sentient (and at extremes, that they have been sentient for years) -- especially if we are, as yo
40.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
Consider the number of humans I've seen make statements that fit that description (about AI, no less!), I don't think that's a strong argument against it.
41.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
> they don’t understand I have not seen any instance of this frequently-made assertion which is at all justified. It seems to rely on a definition of "understand" which is more about spirituality than actual observable evidence
42.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
The definition has already been stretched to not fit the previous models. There is no meaningful, static definition that significantly predates current capabilities. There's a reason why ai xrisk doomers had to come up with the term
43.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
That's already been true for a while, you're overestimating the average human. They just have different failure modes.
44.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
The main relevant difference between the former and all of the latter is that we're generally fine with regulating the labor market, but (liberals at least) are generally much less willing to regulate the interpersonal relationships
45.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
If you mean "set up an equivalent service" under your own domain, that's both less private and more likely to be blocked; there are a lot of services which, unfortunately, only allow sign-ups from big, well-known domains.
46.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
3mo ago
There are a number of CEOs that I would be willing to label as not being rational actors. Bezos would not typically make that list.
47.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
Nowhere in the terms of service for any Anthropic product does it guarantee access to Mythos or Fable.
48.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
I'm less confident in that. To me the way the announcement reads as malicious compliance -- this administration is extremely petty in its dealings, and it's not outside the realm of possibility they asked for and would have accept
49.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
On the matter of being without taste -- which I assume the author is using as a self-derogatory descriptor for not having skill in UI design -- the styling of links on this page could use some change. The link color is so close to the body
50.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
Good addition. Fully agreed on that point, yes. (At the very least for larger models, if not also for smaller ones)
51.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
If you scroll to the bottom of the Fable-5 by effort page, Max effort actually gets this correct! (Along with being the only one I've seen so far to make a bicycle frame that matches the shape of what most bikes on Google images look l
52.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
> Can't use them for basic LLM research, cybersecurity, or beyond-surface-level discussions of biology and virology Your priorities are not everyone else's priorities. The people concerned about AI extinction risk list those as
53.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
It's fundamentally because, despite (nearly) everyone's claims otherwise, the fact that we interact with them through language means we (our brains) model them as a sort of person. (Note that this fact is totally orthogonal as to
54.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
> People argue for AI sentience from a place of emotion couched in logic. they _desperately_ want it to be true and will not take a logical step back. Any argument comes back to "well doesn't a human brain work like that?"
55.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
I think it's a little disingenuous to describe the notoriously-amoral (pathologically dishonest, accused of being a sociopath) CEO of the major AI company as a mere "AI cheerleader". He's not exactly a central example of
56.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
4mo ago
A glance at Wikipedia shows that this is somewhere between misleading overstatement and gross hyperbole, and under contention besides.
57.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
5mo ago
> it's been a thing for at least a decade Maybe in fancy theaters, but in most places it started during covid (and just never stopped)
58.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
5mo ago
> That's one I have not heard before No offense, but if that's the case, you are very new to the discussion. It's been pretty well-documented that opt-out provides orders of magnitude more useful reports than opt-in. For t
59.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
5mo ago
"Most people" with EVs charge while they sleep, because right now it doesn't make as much sense to buy an EV if you're in the actual majority that does not have access to a garage you can install a charger in. That fac
60.
▲
by
LordDragonfang
5mo ago
> the rule of law does not strictly exist in China, the state can compel surveillance cooperation regardless of what might be written down While I agree that China is obviously worse in this regard, it's naive to claim this is uniqu
More ›