Hey, just FYI to everyone: Even though this article is conveying good (and useful) information, it seems to be completely AI-generated. Pangram clocks it as 1

Hey, just FYI to everyone: Even though this article is conveying good (and useful) information, it seems to be completely AI-generated. Pangram clocks it as 100% AI: https://www.pangram.com/history/c410d4b4-abfd-4ca0-b52d-db0d495e6abd https://www.pangram.com/history/c410d4b4-abfd-4ca0-b52d-db0d... Someone else in the thread lists it as 99%: https://www.salahadawi.com/hacker-news-ai-detector https://www.salahadawi.com/hacker-news-ai-detector Also, it sort of jumps out at you if you're used to reading AI writing. Claude loves to start paragraphs with "Here is the uncomfortable part". I'm not necessarily saying this automatically makes it bad, but everyone should be aware of the source of their information.