Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Lewton
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
211.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
How is it an overreaction if the NYC was trying to make him famous and he didn't want to be (real-name) famous? Isn't shutting down his blog the only appropriate action then?
212.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
The journalist writing the NYT story have been in contact with several SSC commenters And I believe (not 100%) it started before the Hsu story
213.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
It’s only the lyrics that are generated (and he’s just using markov chains?) , the music seems to be written by the guy doing them based on the article. So barely anything to do with AI?
214.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
There's a ton of filecoins mirroring the internet archive?
215.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> like people being more vigilant, following distance guidelines, working from home more often Germany was in “lockdown” mode (in quotes because their lockdown never actually needed to be that strict due to proactive reaction) way befor
216.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> Played what he wanted to play, and that didn't include most of his hits. Showed up, collected his fee, left. This I had zero issues with. What really ruined the show I saw was the sloppiness of both dylan and the band. I know he k
217.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
It’s over a year old, with pretty average activity and there’s no other comments with outrage material??
218.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> Guys, this might be a shill account. WTF, there's zero reasons to believe this is a shill account. Looking at the commenters history it looks like a run of the mill HN account (Oh but that's just more proof of shilldom! right
219.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
Great post. Couldn’t agree more. Defending Sweden’s strategy displays “results oriented thinking”, a derogatory term used in poker to describe someone who claims they did the right thing just because they got lucky and won a single hand, co
220.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
I don’t find it particularly odd or hypocritical that the danish government would prefer to avoid a situation where they have to forcefully quarantine people
221.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
Just using population density doesn't give the full picture. Copenhagen metro area has a population of 2 million, while Malmös metro area is around 700k In practice this means that Copenhagens busiest train station (Nørreport) serves
222.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> The fact that Denmark closes down tourist areas, and the border, but allow their citizens to cross the bridge to Sweden and enjoy all the tourist areas there, and then come back to Denmark, that's just silly. This is politically i
223.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
I don't see why having larger nursing homes makes it harder to control how many people get the virus in general. Yes it might affect the death toll, but how's that change the fact that both Denmark and Norway has halted the spread
224.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
Sweden allowed for gatherings of up to 500 people 10+ days after Norway and Denmark had set the limit to less than 50 trying to explain it with "just bad luck" is ridiculously revisionist history edit: sources https://w
225.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> Obviously bad, but all countries are experiencing increased mortality. Not even remotely true. https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps There's at least half a dozen of European countries that imposed measures earl
226.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> If we compare Copenhagen and the city on the Swedish side of the bridge called Malmö, we find that Malmö has less cases and deaths while not having any of those specific restrictions. Why? We don't know for sure We might not &quo
227.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> The numbers I cited from the CDC for Covid are symptomatic fatality rates. I guess the CDC are using symptomatic case fatality to mean the IFR then? Or else it doesn't make any sense. > Any number of different sources; 0.1% is
228.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
Where are you getting the numbers for flu? As far as I'm aware the best guess for flu IFR is 0.04% compared to COVID-19s 0.4% IFR Note that CDC data on the flu is not on the IFR, they only have an estimate for the symptomatic fatality
229.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
I organized a vr party recently with my old beat up vive and people played keep talking and nobody explodes for 6 hours in a row That’s the state of VR today. Whenever I do VR as a social activity there’s never anyone leaving unsatisfied. A
230.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
It takes some amount of people flagging it before it shows up as [flagged] but flagging submissions affect rankings before it reaches that point. On top of that "Ask HN" posts also have some modifier on them that makes them drop q
231.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> That's 1 crash the car was prevented from every 5000 miles. What? That's not at all what disengagements mean
232.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
Hmm, browsing "top" of last month just kind of convinced me that real "hailcorporate" material is much much more rare than I expected
233.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
It's kind of a trick question because it's trivial unless you forget that the hour clock hand doesn't move?
234.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
> Google employs the very elite of the elite I needed that laugh, thank you!
235.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
It's intentionally obscure, I believe the stated reason was that moldbug only wanted people to use Urbit who have buy-in in the form of having spent/wasted a significant amount of time and effort
236.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
I was ranking "randomly selected" higher than "people volunteering" (which was one of the main issues with the santa clara study, mixed with the test used being so imprecise the error bars were big enough to include a 10
237.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
you have an off by one fencepost error ;) You only need to rest four times!
238.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
Thank you for the sources! Initially you were implying that the IFR of the flu was 0.1% and comparing it to an IFR of 0.4%, this is what I disagreed with strongly The bloomberg link you're giving is showing that the vast amount of rand
239.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
There's a strict lower bound of around 0.5% on how mild the IFR can be looking at NYC and Italy https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.18.20070912v... There's absolutely no way that it's be
240.
▲
by
Lewton
6y ago
What's your source for the 0.1% flu number? People are linking to the CDC website which explicitly only looks at symptomatic flu cases. Which means it's NOT the IFR. The flu also has asymptomatic cases!
More ›