Levitz

17 ms·

301.
by Levitz 1y ago
That part I understand, it surely looks awful. The ID side of things though? Having your citizenry send their personal information to foreign companies all across the globe? It's a disaster waiting to happen.
302.
by Levitz 1y ago
You seem to be under the false impression that 4chan makes money, as in, is profitable. It's very much not. Nor does advertising, much less UK advertising, constitute an important influx of money into the "business".
303.
by Levitz 1y ago
4chan is perfectly aware of its reputation, and if that wasn't enough, it's worth noting they banded with kiwifarms on this one: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyjq40vjl7o >Lawyers representing co
304.
by Levitz 1y ago
How often is the default the font the reader wants, as opposed to the one that just comes with their OS?
305.
by Levitz 1y ago
>Not sure how it’s rational if you don’t extend the same distaste to our authoritarian government. Concentration camps, genocide, suppressing free speech, suspending due process. It can be perfectly rational since extending the same dist
306.
by Levitz 1y ago
In a funny way, even the comments on the post here don't match what the post actually says. The writer of the post tries to frame it as an attack towards open source, which is honestly a hard to believe story, whereas the comments here
307.
by Levitz 1y ago
Making the interests of a population subservient to those of a foreign state. Now if that sounds nice to you please, by all means, do just migrate to China.
308.
by Levitz 1y ago
Do the humanities output graduates who are better at thinking for themselves? I've read far too many accounts of people plainly stating that they just pretended to spouse an ideology in order to pass a class for me to take such thing a
309.
by Levitz 1y ago
>Privacy from who? Law enforcement has been leveraging that forever. Not without legal proceedings. The population would have been absolutely outraged if the government just decided to read all of their mail one random day in the 90s. Th
310.
by Levitz 1y ago
No, because there was an expectation of privacy. That expectation is no longer there.
311.
by Levitz 1y ago
>I mean, otherwise would be like not being bound to speed limits if you don't have a speedometer. That only works in a world in which the government provides speedometers, which restrict the vehicle automatically, and in this case t
312.
by Levitz 1y ago
I'm not sure what to think of this, on first impression I don't like it, but maybe I have a misguided impression on how this works. Does ChatGPT properly handle western social customs? I'd say yes, and I presume that's b
313.
by Levitz 1y ago
So... Culture? Are we doubting the existence of culture now?
314.
by Levitz 1y ago
>Such books will no longer be published if universities are not free. That depends on which are the ways in which they are not free. Government influence is categorically worse because of its very nature, but I'm trying to think of
315.
by Levitz 1y ago
>The orientation relative to gravity is fundamental to the functioning of the mug. Yes. Changing your system of reference fixes this too. Just get upside down glasses, gravity now goes "up" and the mug is upside down. Works per
316.
by Levitz 1y ago
The problem is not considering them arbitrary or not. We are sure to derive expressions from reality in some way, I'm sure that many languages have different versions of saying that something is so boring it puts someone "to sleep
317.
by Levitz 1y ago
The direction with which you perceive the mug is not any more arbitrary than that of the map, you are just prioritizing the direction gravity takes rather than its opposite, same as magnetism and the north. You can change your entire system
318.
by Levitz 1y ago
Well sure but all this is doing is displaying the audience on screens and drawing squares around their faces. I seriously doubt this breaks any law, I saw them in summer last year and they were already doing this, given that the article is
319.
by Levitz 1y ago
The off center content, the jarring contrast between the background and the image, the padding at the bottom, the changing of the cursor to a very similar, yet different one... The page is clearly coherent, I don't meant to imply the a
320.
by Levitz 1y ago
How solid is the first amendment protection for calls for violence?
321.
by Levitz 1y ago
I do not condone political violence. My country has seen enough of it and still suffers from its consequences. (Spain) That said, the assassination of Carrero Blanco, who was set to be Franco's successor, was instrumental in Spain&#x27
322.
by Levitz 1y ago
There would never be an agreement of terms. Talk about separation is generally based on the fantasy that states would just each go their own way, which is both absurd and a terrible precedent to set, do you think California would agree to p
323.
by Levitz 1y ago
You don't deserve death just because you justify a situation in which some people die. If a person is against, say, laws against tobacco, that person doesn't deserve lung cancer. If a person argues for leniency on criminals, they
324.
by Levitz 1y ago
>Is anyone forcing you to use a default? Why don't you levy this argument against yourself? >How are you excluded because other people can make different choices? Because I cannot. By your own points, I can't express myself
325.
by Levitz 1y ago
If the day comes in which Unicode is dropped as a standard I can guarantee you, this kind of bloat will be part of the reason
326.
by Levitz 1y ago
>The steelman argument would be that we have provided a way for folks who felt excluded to now feel more represented. >And just repeating that yellow is abstract and inclusive doesn't address the fact that it's objectively f
327.
by Levitz 1y ago
>This is someone with a pedigree, able to land an apple job, pass the interviews, work with a team, has mortgage/family/whatever, etc but he upset a sultan sitting on his silk pillow and now must be thrown out on the streets? R
328.
by Levitz 1y ago
>Whether an action has gotten a legal thumbs-up or not is of little relevance here. On the contrary, I don't think there's anything more relevant. That such action can be legal speaks volumes about the state of what is legal an
329.
by Levitz 1y ago
Well I have, I don't think there is as much focus on movement there. Ori relies a lot on the grapple dash, there's way WAY less freedom in terms of movement, which is what the writer is going for when talking about 3d mario games,
330.
by Levitz 1y ago
It Is hard, sure. But this: "Silksong as a game should not exist. It is so brutally difficult that it stretches the very definition of the word "game"" is an immense exaggeration, I could understand this for, maybe, IWBT

More ›