3 ms·
>Is anyone forcing you to use a default? Why don't you levy this argument against yourself? >How are you excluded because other people can make different choi
by Levitz 1y ago
>Is anyone forcing you to use a default?
Why don't you levy this argument against yourself?
>How are you excluded because other people can make different choices?
Because I cannot. By your own points, I can't express myself in a race-neutral way anymore.
>Maybe being disgusted by others choices for casual conversation is a personal matter. Something you could address with software to disregard whatever is so offensive, or a support group, or inward reflection.
This is, again, better levied against your position.
- paulryanrogers 1y ago>>Is anyone forcing you to use a default? > Why don't you levy this argument against yourself? How? I don't feel forced by others having options or even the existence of a default. >> Maybe being disgusted by others choices... > This is, again, better levied against your position. I'm not the one whose disgusted or even bothered. Not even by your opinion. (I just don't share it.) >> How are you excluded because other people can make different choices? > Because I cannot. By your own points, I can't express myself in a race-neutral way anymore. Thanks for clarifying. IMO you can just accept the defaults, whatever their tone/complexion, and move on. I don't think anyone is bothered by yellow being an imperfect attempt at race neutrality, so long as there are options for folks to pick whatever they're comfortable with.
- zahlman 1y ago> I don't think anyone is bothered by yellow being an imperfect attempt at race neutrality The sheer length of the discussion suggests otherwise.
- paulryanrogers 1y agoIs 5 comments really that deep? IMO it only suggests that misunderstandings and disagreements take a while to sort out in a text mediums. Debate doesn't mean people are out to get you.