LeanderK

62 ms·

601.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I really don't know anything about MRI and their usage, i was mainly criticising that his arguments sounded like a lot of the arguments I've heard against other usages of ML-Algorithms. What I meant: There's probably a medica
602.
by LeanderK 8y ago
Moving the cursor was really sluggish on Safari for the first two to five minutes and afterwards I didn't notice lag. Maybe it's some JIT-compiler warm-up phase?
603.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I never understood these arguments. Isn't it like claiming self-driving cars via neural networks would never be possible because you can't test that the neural network would take the correct decision in every situation? I view the
604.
by LeanderK 8y ago
Are you serious? That sounds like a stupid idea, what if you need a car for/to reach work? then this is really counterproductive.
605.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I will never understand the blatant hatred towards refugees. I was and am still surprised by the number of people who just indiscriminately hate refugees in Germany (although they are often a small minority). These are just 561 poor human b
606.
by LeanderK 8y ago
well, i think it does matter! Especially if you're pure (or try to be) it really matters, because you need constructs like monads to remain pure.
607.
by LeanderK 8y ago
but I don't see how you are debating me! I mostly agree, but that's my argument :) > If Haskell was truly free of any state, this would be impossible to guarantee. I was never claming that haskell was free of state, i was claim
608.
by LeanderK 8y ago
while I agree with your overall argument, i think this is wrong: > And pure functions are probably best tagged with an asterisk because most of the time you have state to manage somewhere purity does not mean there is no state! This is e
609.
by LeanderK 8y ago
>However if you look at a lot of the research projects you kind of scratch your head at the actual output (which imo is the real problem). Can you elaborate? What do you mean?
610.
by LeanderK 8y ago
"Very dull content for anyone who has worked on anything related to rockets during the past 20 years. Every manufacturer has similar prototype rockets and there is nothing special in this rocket prototype." :) I can't imagine
611.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I think it's a major step towards more pleasant type-level programming in haskell. I recently worked on a very type-level heavy side-project and the matchability is a real issue. I think this could drastically simplify the whole single
612.
by LeanderK 8y ago
is there no illustration what it may have looked like? I have no idea what they are talking about but it sounds interesting...
613.
by LeanderK 8y ago
shouldn't this be possible? I don't see why not?
614.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I haven't read the paper the work is based on, but if the RNN outputs a probability distribution for the next letter/word then they form Markov Chains (since then they only depend on the current state and not the previous state)!
615.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I don't think this is an valid argument. I think that "art", as understood now, is pretty much the word for "art". A language is an evolving thing and the usage defines the meaning. Many words change their meaning a
616.
by LeanderK 8y ago
> Such a practice seems especially outrageous to modern viewers, considering our appreciation of Egyptian artifacts as masterful works of fine art, but Bleiberg is quick to point out that “ancient Egyptians didn’t have a word for ‘art.’
617.
by LeanderK 8y ago
are there any pockets of artists left? I don't mean famous ones, there's probably someone who can pay enough to compete with tech-workers
618.
by LeanderK 8y ago
but I don't think it's a suprise, since rust is made to be fast while haskell is made to be beautiful (for some sense of beautiful)
619.
by LeanderK 8y ago
it wasn't meant in a literal sense, maybe some quotation marks around his would have helped.
620.
by LeanderK 8y ago
the article is probably the most selfish thing I've read in a while. It's not evil or exploitative, it's just very selfish. But I think it's not so morally wrong that OpenAI should not do business with him since they hav
621.
by LeanderK 8y ago
couldn't they just maintain a separate proxy indipendent of aws?
622.
by LeanderK 8y ago
Nix tackles the problem, but (my impression) requires a complete buy-in and is not really a gradual step. I have also heard bad experiences with mac os.
623.
by LeanderK 8y ago
But I think this really depends on your work-enviroment. If you have a lot of different servers I understand that this could get really annoying, especially with all the context-switching. But I just have to work with a few (where I have a
624.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I convinced that neural network will never be interpretable like code. They will just get even more complex, so to employ them in critical applications (my motivation is more healthcare, where similiar constraints are present. People can di
625.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I am reasonably well versed in the whole adversarial-input research. I am not sure whether this is really the problem. It's a tradeoff. This essentially introduces a random chance that you classification will fail (since adversarial in
626.
by LeanderK 8y ago
> But SARA doesn’t rely as much on “high-order” functions like AI since those are harder to certify. (“To be FAA certifiable, you need a certain level of determinism in the outcomes,” Van Buiten says.) I wonder whether a hybrid approach
627.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I was JUST searching for something like this! This is great!
628.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I have a weird fascination with bruatlist architecture. It seems that everybody else hates it, but I like (some of) it. It's a bit the architecture of the 60s in general, universally hated in germany. But I find the optimism and futuri
629.
by LeanderK 8y ago
well, the task of distinguishing cats and dogs is vastly different from the task of what defines a dog and a cat. You don't need to learn the underlying data-manifold, but just a decision-function between those two data-manifolds. We c
630.
by LeanderK 8y ago
I would go for a PWA! Easy sharing & collaboriation for notes without having to install an app would awesome! I also think all the available APIs would be enough for a note-taking app. iOS improved it's support massivly in the late

More ›