Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LawTalkingGuy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
61.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> specific copyright terms of use There's no such thing. Without a license you can't enforce any restrictions. AI training is basically just building a very complex Markov chain, that's obviously not copyright violation be
62.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
This is how it is a failed system. It doesn't really do what most people who have one think it does and yet it gets rolled into law and everyone now has to deal with it constantly while still not fixing the original issue. It's li
63.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
>> bias against cishet identities. > I always hear this, but I never see it. Could you share a few examples? Jobs. There are too many white, asian, and Indian males in my company, we're told. So we have to hire others preferen
64.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> There is no part of the official process where anyone is required to listen to or respect the opinion of a protest. That's kind of obvious. Actually, I think there is one - government media. CBC/BBC/etc should cover thes
65.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
Just for kicks, are you? And why does it matter? I'm part of a multi-racial group of parents. What does it matter if I'm the asian one or the white one or the black one?
66.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> Please read the first paragraph of the wikipedia article, it'll clarify the issue. No. It doesn't. Because we have the school boards saying this in this in their own words and publishing them in their policy updates. All the
67.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> wiki: Anecdotal Evidence Yes, but you haven't explained why this is a problem though. Let's say a black man gets beaten by the police. It's just "anecdotal" in that he hasn't performed a study showing that
68.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> when you don't have factual evidence. You don't understand evidence. When our school boards are getting rid of advanced classes they're referencing race based reasoning like that example. Also, these specific recommendat
69.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> Why are we talking about this? Why here? Because, as I said below, I posted that in response to this specific thread somewhat by mistake. I was discussing racially motivated changes in university acceptance criteria on a parenting foru
70.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> Are we on a submission about language? Why are you guys talking about race-based admissions My mistake. I'm also discussing the anti SAT/ACT and anti-MCAT movement on parenting forums and I open posts in new tabs to respond t
71.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
So did I, but those forums were different. As someone else pointed out, no selfies, no actual names, no real identities. There's no hard and fast rule the government can apply which would serve the people, for sure. But from a parent&#
72.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
It's not as much that it's trivial (but it seems like it always is because social engineering never stops working) but that once the attacker has authed they can generally delete whatever extra file or record they made and stay au
73.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
There's so much condescension in that sentence alone. They say 'LatinX', where the correct term is Latin . They specifically list black students because the constant message in the liberal USA is that black people aren'
74.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
And if they aren't using such a password library, what other errors are likely? Timing attack on the character of the pw which failed?
75.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
Because the model doesn't contain facts at any point - only words. The size of the LLMs is an easy way to currently demonstrate this - even if you took only the factual statements from all its training material and compressed them, the
76.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
What problem are you trying to solve with e-voting? To make the vote more accurate by cutting down on UI-type errors? Get results sooner? > > Not only should the voter be marking their ballot by hand not doing so through a machine who
77.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
The railroads did not enable the Nazi genocides, they merely shaped them. Rwanda killed a higher percentage of people, more quickly, without any advanced infrastructure. Without railroads the Nazis would have put the camps closer to the pop
78.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
That's like licensing all photocopiers to make sure the state knows who can produce propaganda. Not only is it an obvious rights violation, but it will never work. If watermarking is the solution it needs to be applied to the legitimat
79.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
You can't hire their research arm. > regardless of how you feel about consulting It's a matter of how well they do it. They're not known for creating customer value. > Are the only companies that make sense the ones ...
80.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
I don't think that it's always a lib/con issue, even if it gets played that way on the news, and I think the actual conservative side is often a lot more focused on kindness and safety than they are played. Even where I disag
81.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
If only a few people at an event publish photos and video there's a lot of dead space/time to insert stories, but if nearly everyone publishes their video feed the majority of the event will be locked down. And not just multiple a
82.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
Tell you what, I'll examine any of those studies with you if you wish. If you're serious, tell me which claims resonate with you and we can examine them. My post (parent to yours) outlined enough problems with "studies"
83.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
https://www.clearchoiceprep.com/sat-act-prep-blog/the-most-i... Basically though, anything that relies on something not printed on the test runs this risk.
84.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> there is significant value at the world level, of keeping secrets. There can be. But secrets can also be unimportant, or easily learnable through other public means. We need to analyze what we're keeping secret and optimize. The d
85.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
Russia is literally claiming that the Ukraine is run by Nazis. Not that there are people there who see the Nazis as a lesser threat than the Reds, but run by Nazis today. That's a lie so big it's visible from space.
86.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> "IQ" tests (which are completely fraudulent) No, not really. Up for debate is pretty much only the overloading of the word 'intelligence'. But whatever it is, it correlates well with job performance and maximum leve
87.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
Embeddings are great for this, capture all posts by all people in the sub and embed them, then cluster users by their overall position and the distances between their posts, etc, to profile them ideologically and single-issue wise, and then
88.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
> NFTs are still happening, but the insane multi-million dollar monkey jpegs are not really happening anymore I think all the high valuations are money laundering. You create a pre-order system and get your friends on it, then buy their
89.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
Remove the potential for abuse by still requiring the application to be approved.
90.
▲
by
LawTalkingGuy
3y ago
Only the marketers are saying it's a panacea. Vertical farming (defined as the inefficient use of indoor farming, versus greenhouses which are an efficient use of indoor farming) is not a good replacement for most sorts of food product
More ›