Krasnol

52 ms·

691.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> Who cares if they had nuclear because of military goals I do care if someone desperately tries to sell nuclear as green/sustainable or even wants my taxpayer money to fuel this kind of crap (EU). > Germany releases over 5 times
692.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Regulating nuclear makes it even worse economically. Today's state of their fleet shows: they missed the train on renewables. Would they have them, they wouldn't have to buy so much dirty power from abroad. Also: others wouldn&#x2
693.
by Krasnol 4y ago
This is a useless graphic. They HAVE to export because they can't regulate and they have to sell so the dishonest hidden price scheme they drive with their tax payer doesn't get too bad. In the end they still need dirty power fro
694.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> Did you look at historical data on who gave who electricity in former years? I did and Germany has been exporting more than they buy for decades. Considering that just like France it is part of a single market and France HAS to run th
695.
by Krasnol 4y ago
It is right now completely exposed since they heavily depend on deliveries of dirty energy from Germany, UK, etc. and it will get even worse in the winter if they don't fix the show up.
696.
by Krasnol 4y ago
So you say we should price in all those fossil and renewable sources which help France and they rotting nuclear fleet these days? The whole "criticism" (more like: meddling) of Lazard grew from the fans of nuclear. It doesn't
697.
by Krasnol 4y ago
It was missing LNG imports to Germany.
698.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I don't get your criticism. Why should there not be zero fuel cost? Your second argument is supposed to be a variable? Since with a wider grid, the volatility falls ("there is always wind somewhere"). I also don't think
699.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> The age of downloading content to your device is largely dead mon frère! I hear that since Netflix came up. I'm pretty sure it'll be there long after Netflix is gone. With all those 1-click-hosters it's easier than ever
700.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I plug it in just the same way I'd do with a gaming laptop.
701.
by Krasnol 4y ago
A CMOS battery lasts probably something around 5 years.
702.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I doubt they'll lower their prices anytime soon.
703.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Are you even aware that France has a price set by the government and that the French taxpayer has been subsidising nuclear power all the time already? How about you punish somebody else for a change?
704.
by Krasnol 4y ago
It won't be ready in three months but it will be better next year and the subsequent summer and so on. Better every year. Unlike with building new reactors where the only subsequent events are news about rising costs and later completi
705.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Holy moly. This is dark. So you want to punish the same people who paid for that ignorant course of several governments by subsidising the state regulated energy price and the companies providing that energy and which are constantly bankrup
706.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Without Paywall: https://archive.ph/vn7CT
707.
Inside the Apple vs. Facebook Privacy Fight(wsj.com)
6 points by Krasnol 4y ago|1 comments
708.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Google directions are the second best navigation experience I had here in Germany for cycling. Close behind OSM (probably because they take data from OSM without saying so...). Cycle ways are also quite well documented here. It shouldn&#x27
709.
by Krasnol 4y ago
The funny thing was: my college who has always the newest IPhone told me one day that google maps on his phone wouldn't route him along cycle roads. It was of course Apple Maps and it doesn't have cycle routing in my quite big cit
710.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> Claims resulting from nuclear accidents are covered under Price-Anderson; for that reason, all U.S. property and liability insurance policies exclude nuclear accidents. Claims can include any incident (including those caused by theft o
711.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> It’s getting cheaper. I'm looking forward to those sources on that bold claim. > This will soon change ...and I hope that claim was not based upon that wishful thinking but on actual facts which are valid today. > Stars use
712.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> That leaves wind, solar, and nuclear. With current tech, nuclear is the thing that takes the least concrete, the least real estate… and with the exception of regular maintenance and hot rivers delivers its full power at will. But takes
713.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> Renewable's are amazing, the more the merrier. But discarding nuclear over it's waste isn't a genuine argument. How isn't it when it actually is in Germany? > We've gotten better than the 60s/70/80
714.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> but France manages pretty well with 70% of energy coming from nuclear so it is an actually existing counterpoint. How is that embarrassing state "pretty well"? They use dirty power from their neighbours to manage their suppor
715.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Are you trolling me? I didn't say this is supposed to be the only way of getting power. You can put solar everywhere. Not just on roofs and you might have heard about wind. That's a thing too.
716.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> Those things in the middle do sound risky. But what's the alternative really? What energy do we have that (i) scales, and (ii) comes at will? Right now that's mostly nuclear and fossil. No. That's just a proper grid with
717.
by Krasnol 4y ago
So now that we talked about the most radioactive and least radioactive waste, we might get to the stuff between. The amount is neither small enough to fit "into a single gymnasium" nor can it be ignored. It has to be stored for ge
718.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> The fact is the waste is negligible. Esspecially so when you consider the return of energy It doesn't matter how much energy it "returns". It doesn't make the waste less worse for generations. > Per square meter
719.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> The figures I have for France (from Jean-Marc Jancovici) are that for the entire history of French nuclear energy, the total volume of long term, high-intensity nuclear waste is that of a single gymnasium. Which is surely just the fuel
720.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> First they are practical - unlike all renewables nuclear energy plant provides stable influx of energy to the electric grid, regardless of the weather condition. That was "practical" in the 80s. Today it's a problem. You

More ›