Krasnol

32 ms·

571.
by Krasnol 4y ago
It is the way of wasting money while facing the reality of cheap and truly clean alternatives. It's the way backwards. https://www.forbes.com/sites/amorylovins/2019/11/18/does-nuc... And I&#x27
572.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Wind alone produces ~20% of the recent years electricity in Germany. Nuclear produced only half of that in recent years. The whole renewable energy production covers ~40% of all the energy produced. Despite 16 years of almost full stop of e
573.
by Krasnol 4y ago
The authors profile is even more hilarious than the article: https://nationalinterest.org/profile/todd-royal
574.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I doubt Musk is a good example for this argument.
575.
by Krasnol 4y ago
The argument doesn't make any sense since one has nothing to do with the other. See my edit.
576.
by Krasnol 4y ago
You neither proved that what they did was actually horrible nor did you actually stop blaming them, even when they're not to blame for the outcome we see today. So what is this? Why are you keep doing this? This thread is a circle jerk
577.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> providES PovidED. You even admit it in the following sentence... > It used to be around 25% back in 2000 And people where spreading the same fake news and fear back than. As we see today: it was stupid. > and was still above 10%
578.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I like how you admit in the first sentence that you don't care about the facts regarding the false blame and just blindly continue to do so. Meanwhile, without them, we wouldn't have almost half of our electricity generated by act
579.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Sure. Like a nuclear accident in one of the rotting French reactors for example. Meanwhile, the expansion of cheap renewable energy which gets better and cheaper continues to happen.
580.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Why should there be no growth? Do you have ANY facts on that because the facts out there, especially the already ongoing actual growth on renewables, show the exact opposite? Where do you even get the Finland story from? It's not like
581.
by Krasnol 4y ago
How should there be deindustrialization in any sector when nuclear provided between 3 and 6% to the whole mix? This is a ridiculous claim. Edit: Source https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/En
582.
by Krasnol 4y ago
His opinion follows a simple formula: whatever <insert some other party> says, he'll be against it. No matter if it makes sense or not. It's a quite popular strategy on the right side of the political spectrum in the West.
583.
by Krasnol 4y ago
The green party hasn't been in power for the last 16 year. Still, the conservatives didn't change anything about this. Now they're a minority in a coalition. Still, nobody did anything about it. The fact that some people (esp
584.
by Krasnol 4y ago
They're actually going to phase out coal completely by 2038. After 16 years of Merkel breaking renewables, they're being expanded again. An expansion which, in the past helped to establish this technology on this planet. Edit (sin
585.
by Krasnol 4y ago
@OPs comment: Keyboard has not been replaced by nothing. OP says he uses nothing. ------------------ @the topic: physical keyboard has not been replaced by some random character generator. The on-display keyboard does at least the same job
586.
by Krasnol 4y ago
That's not the point. Parking sensors are pretty much standard in this price range, and have been for quite a while.
587.
by Krasnol 4y ago
> I had friends in college who were replacing ~$400-500 machines almost yearly Come on...can we tone down the ridiculous statements here, please? I don't know what your friends did to this hardware, but there isn't anything out
588.
by Krasnol 4y ago
The author didn't question the artistic aspect. He says: > It’s a purely stylistic choice, employed for that one moment to cast doubt on Billy’s trustworthiness in the audience’s mind. It’s an extremely stagey choice that fits neat
589.
by Krasnol 4y ago
You are right, and it works quite well in the dark months to just watch it later when it's dark outside, but that won't work for everybody. I wonder how many people pull up brightness on their TVs only for that reason and ruin the
590.
by Krasnol 4y ago
There is compensation and there is overcompensation. The frame displayed there is obviously too bright, and this is the point.
591.
by Krasnol 4y ago
It looks longer than it is if you speak it though. It looks scary too btw. Had to double-check it too because you rarely write it as words in German (I'm not German too).
592.
by Krasnol 4y ago
This is my point too: all of this is not "human-friendly" but "American-friendly" or in the case of dates "english-friendly".
593.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I feel you...I'm not German myself. It's quite annoying, and every time I want to be sure that the number I speak is understood properly, I give it number by number. I've seen too many Germans having issues with that myself,
594.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Same in Polish.
595.
by Krasnol 4y ago
It only is human-firendly if you grew up with it, so it's rather "American-friendly". > You don't say "25th Apartment", you say "Apartment 25", We say 25th March in German. Saying the whole date fo
596.
by Krasnol 4y ago
It's not as much about "cheap work" but about "cheaper work" and there will always be cheaper work somewhere.
597.
by Krasnol 4y ago
There are many means of storage out there already. There is also spreading out of the grid and diversifying renewables sources. This is not some mysterious magic which needs to be performed here. The tools are out there.
598.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I wonder how one measures "over-regulation" in a serious way here. The examples I've seen either come from opinions of certain individuals and the accompanying lobby groups or by setting it next to other regulations from coun
599.
by Krasnol 4y ago
I was talking about Musk.
600.
by Krasnol 4y ago
Yes. There are competitors and besides the consumers and future contracts there are also investors.

More ›