4 ms·

> providES PovidED. You even admit it in the following sentence... > It used to be around 25% back in 2000 And people where spreading the same fake news and

> providES PovidED. You even admit it in the following sentence... > It used to be around 25% back in 2000 And people where spreading the same fake news and fear back than. As we see today: it was stupid. > and was still above 10% untill very recently... No it wasn't. It was 6% max and more like 3% before Ukraine. If you want to correct somebody's statement, bring sources. Here is one for my numbers: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Energie/Erzeugung/_inhalt.html https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Energ... > Well... I'm sorry, but you seem to be an expert on those. Compared to what you dropped here, I actually am one. Thank you.

qwytw 4y ago
> No it wasn't. It was 6% max and more like 3% before Ukraine. If you want to correct somebody's statement, bring sources. Here is one for my numbers If you actually looked at data from previous years on the site you posted: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Energie/Erzeugung/Tabellen/bruttostromerzeugung.html https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Energ... You would see that nuclear was still 11,8% in 2021. I mean really? You keep saying stuff like "fake news" and "ridiculous claim" when you can't even be bothered to read the sources you're "citing". Why?
- dang 4y ago
  Please don't do tit-for-tat flamewars on HN. They're destructive of what we're trying for here, and tedious to everyone else. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
dang 4y ago
Please don't do tit-for-tat flamewars on HN. They're destructive of what we're trying for here, and tedious to everyone else. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html