Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Kranar
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
72 ms
·
751.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
That's a most unusual definition of decisive.
752.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I doubt the issue has anything to do with being interesting or not. Do you know this for a fact or can give me anything to follow up on what it means for a decision to be interesting? For example if a decision procedure required the choice
753.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I feel like Buridan's Principle is either poorly worded, or most likely I just completely fail to understand it. The principle says: "A discrete decision based upon an input having a continuous range of values cannot be made withi
754.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You can be in favor of whatever you want, some people like vanilla, some people like chocolate. The issue is when someone who likes vanilla claims that people who like chocolate are acting unprofessionally and doing something wrong or doing
755.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
>Academia is full of mechanisms to negatively judge your research work. Fascinating, as I did not find this at all to be the case in general. I imagine in some cases it could be true, but for the most part I found most research in academ
756.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
>If you can't be specific enough to be scientific about it, just keep it to yourself.
757.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I don't accept either side of the argument as true, my point is simply that telling someone to keep their story to themselves unless they can present an argument that satisfies a scientific standard is missing the point being made. Peo
758.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I don't think he's trying to do himself any favors. If anything he's trying to do others a favor by expressing a very common problem within academia.
759.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
It's not exhausting, you're just refusing to understand the other side of the argument. Criticizing in a vague way is precisely appropriate in a situation where you don't want to make the criticism specific to a single circum
760.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I'm also someone who entered the field for money. As someone who grew up in a family of poor immigrants who pushed me to work hard and opened the door to opportunities that I'd have never been exposed to in their home country, it&
761.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
No that's not true, the vast majority of companies/positions do not do this. Most companies that pay very well and are competitive do it, and the reason is because we get so many crappy applicants that it remains to this day the l
762.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You do not need to be based in the U.S. in order to be prosecuted for a crime against the U.S. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction_over_int...
763.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
If we're talking about this: https://crowcpp.org Then the project is pretty active, has multiple commits per week based on its log.
764.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
>Most self-styled experts on developer productivity seem more interested in selling something rather than painting an accurate picture of how devs really work. Says a blog post from a CTO who sells a product to track software productivit
765.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
You're suggesting that there is some coordinated and intentional scheme by the ruling class to use economists as a way to serve them, my whole point is that there need not be any such conspiracy or intentional malice for this to occur
766.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
This is absurd. Naturopaths devote their lives to health and medicine, just to serve their former colleagues who are hundreds of times richer than them? If you actually paid attention to real policy and the sort of practices naturopaths a
767.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
>I'm not really sure what you're basing this off of. I've worked in prominent universities teaching math classes and would definitely not make such a claim. I think you're being deliberately obtuse here. Are you genui
768.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
What's unclear is your use of the word "rational". It appears you are using that word to mean "actions that are in accordance with values I approve of" instead of its common meaning which is more along the lines of
769.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Costa Rica has the same population as Metro Toronto and 15 times the rate of violent crime. It might be better than some of its neighbors but it doesn't remotely compare favorably to Europe or Canada.
770.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Almost every member of the State Council of China consists of people with STEM degrees (mostly engineering), followed by some with an economics/finance background.
771.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I test for competency not experience. If your experience makes you competent then great, if it doesn't make you competent then so be it, I don't care one way or another because I'm not looking to hire experienced people but r
772.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
The whole point is that I'm mostly indifferent about whether someone is a veteran programmer with 20 years of experience or is a recent grad with 2-3 years of experience. The number of years of experience matters very little to me. Bot
773.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
>The rule to never include anything from a header is just the ultimate cleanup. What? No the two have nothing to do with one another. The clean up in the Linux kernel involves having more granular includes, that is breaking up very large
774.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
It's because in many cases the years of experience doesn't count for much, that's why. The sad truth is I get plenty of resumes from people with 20+ years of experience and when I interview them to see how they actually write
775.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
The article isn't about cleaning up header files. I don't think anyone criticizing the article is claiming that reducing the amount of code in header files will speed up compile times. The burden that the author should substantiat
776.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
Loading the same file from disk twice (which will be cached in memory) and parsing a file are not the same things. Furthermore almost every C++ compiler I'm aware of, including icc, gcc, clang, msvc, has optimizations to special case h
777.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
>Many ideas seem great on paper but fail in practice. Yes, including the one posted by the author, sounds great on paper but in practice provides next to no benefit. Notice how the author has provided absolutely zero evidence to justify
778.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
It's silly to say Two Sigma consistently beat the market. They have multiple funds and only one of their numerous funds (Two Sigma Enhanced Compass) has managed to outperform the S&P 500 over a 5 year period, the rest have signific
779.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
I don't know that fairness has much to do with anything but both statements are true. At one extreme Tether had a .7% deviation over a 20 minute period, and on the other extreme Tether had a .7% deviation over 2 years. Which objective
780.
▲
by
Kranar
4y ago
There are no laws against depicting Muhammad in Saudi Arabia. Muslims frown upon depictions of prophets (including Jesus) because of its tendency to result in idolatry, but there is nothing criminal or illegal about it.
More ›