Kranar

67 ms·

781.
by Kranar 4y ago
Yes it's a common term when discussing clinical/medical trials, for example when testing a new drug, but it's not a common term used to describe a legal trial and a simple Google search confirms this, feel free to conduct the
782.
by Kranar 4y ago
If you need to sift through 200 years of history to find an example of something you are certain is true, then you should reconsider the standard by which you distinguish truths from pure speculation. You are welcome to speculate that one o
783.
by Kranar 4y ago
>not at all clear that this is even impeachable. What is your understanding of what an impeachment is?
784.
by Kranar 4y ago
>Surely in the previous 200 years, some Justice has done something of similar unbecoming-ness. If something is surely true, then you can surely point to an example of it.
785.
by Kranar 4y ago
You are coming to the wrong conclusion. The fact that almost no Justice has faced impeachment is precisely why it's unlikely a Justice leaked this document. Also impeachment does not require any statute to be broken, an officer of the
786.
by Kranar 4y ago
That would be career suicide for a justice and almost certainly result in impeachment. Furthermore there's almost no reason for any justice to do such a thing.
787.
by Kranar 4y ago
People who express concern about H1-B "slaves" and evil exploitation are not doing so out of a genuine interest for the well being of immigrants. They are doing so out of fear that those immigrants are taking away jobs that they f
788.
by Kranar 4y ago
There was no C++ Standard's Committee in 1993.
789.
by Kranar 4y ago
Antihistamines such as Reactin don't help? I am also allergic to cats and dogs and Reactin does wonders.
790.
by Kranar 5y ago
I am happy to hear the other side of it. It feels like only the people who have an axe to grind are allowed to vent on HN about their anecdotal experiences, and it's considered taboo to share successes.
791.
by Kranar 5y ago
The majority of hedge funds fail within 3 years, having never reached profitability.
792.
by Kranar 5y ago
Not really, it had nothing to do with implementation difficulty and the paper actually states that implementing static if would be fairly easy: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013
793.
by Kranar 5y ago
What does "wholly in C++20" mean? How does "wholly in C++20" differ from "partially in C++20" or just "using C++20"?
794.
by Kranar 5y ago
You want the opposite behavior in order to be cache friendly, an RC system where the counts are stored next to the object.
795.
by Kranar 5y ago
>This isn’t formal science. Computer science is absolutely a formal science in every sense of the word. >If Boehm GCs really leak as much as you claim then nobody would use them. I mean if anything this argument applies more to your c
796.
by Kranar 5y ago
> A GC must maintain the property that a leak is only possible if an object is reachable from a root. RC on its own does not obey this property. This is certainly a false claim then. What you're describing is a precise garbage colle
797.
by Kranar 5y ago
>You might as well classify allocating without freeing as a form of garbage collection. Of course, Java even explicitly supports this garbage collection strategy: https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/318 The best definitio
798.
by Kranar 5y ago
This is simply untrue. Marcus is a fully licensed online-only bank, they have no physical branches whatsoever and everything is done through their website: https://www.marcus.com/us/en There's also Green Dot Bank
799.
by Kranar 5y ago
All anyone is asking for are examples and while everyone is happy to go on and on with long paragraphs about how white Christian men are under attack and portrayed as evil, while gays, browns and Muslims are portrayed as absolutely perfect
800.
by Kranar 5y ago
I mean almost every single one of them prior to the rise of Christianity and the influence of modern western culture. The Chinese had no qualms with gay marriage or homosexuality in general, there are records of famous Japanese Samurais who
801.
by Kranar 5y ago
Human history has existed for much longer with same-sex marriages than without it. It was mostly outlawed with the rise of Christianity. The impact of same-sex marriage on child rearing is well understood as same-sex couples raising childre
802.
by Kranar 5y ago
Cuties isn't a children's film, it's rated MA (for mature audiences). There is no dispute that Netflix has woke programming, or heck many other kinds of programming and no sensible person would claim otherwise. What is being
803.
by Kranar 5y ago
Are you just making this up?
804.
by Kranar 5y ago
Nothing, mcintyre1994 is simply wrong about this. You don't need 51% to block transactions, any miner who completes the proof of work can legitimately block a transaction and Bitcoin went long periods of time where various miners block
805.
by Kranar 5y ago
You are incorrect about this. Worst case and Big O are independent of one another. The O, Ω, Θ, etc... are about describing bounds where O(f) is used for the set of asymptotic upper bounds on f, Ω(f) is the set of asymptotic lower bounds on
806.
by Kranar 5y ago
When you say that you've observed what has happened over multiple decades, are you observing people within your own social circle and are those people from a diverse and representative background or are they from a narrow demographic?
807.
by Kranar 5y ago
It's awkward only in the sense that the valuations are absolutely worthless. You can back test the 1 year target estimates of almost any company to see for yourself that they are junk, in fact this topic has been studied almost to deat
808.
by Kranar 5y ago
The dot-com bubble predates FINRA Rule 2241 which was adopted in 2015. [1] https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/2...
809.
by Kranar 5y ago
Fair point, perhaps this would be a more reliable source but the information is the same: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script
810.
by Kranar 5y ago
Laws in the sciences are all components of models. Newton's three laws are a component of Newtonian mechanics, so are the laws of thermodynamics. Arguing semantics about what a law is is the least interesting aspect of this discussion,

More ›