Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
KnobbleMcKnees
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
2y ago
Hard agree. They also glossed over JS using a single threaded model precisely to avoid the huge mental overhead of dealing with multi-threaded models (I'm saying this is why it happened and this is the problem they aimed to solve, not
2.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
2y ago
>Not happy about this post. Instead of asking to stop, they should do just what they suggest, without further ado - distribute the income to the ecosystem devs the way they see fit. Make it transparent, make application to these funds po
3.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
The qualities of sets that arrays don't have (and vice versa) are irrelevant to the point of neither being implicitly representable in XML. You're either providing complex objects as properties or you're providing a list of c
4.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
Yeah this was what I was going for, same point stands
5.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
No you've misunderstood my point. This doesn't work for cases where one child is in fact a property that is a complex object. XML claims to solve the problem of attributes vs children but then falls short at the first hurdle by no
6.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
This is a bad take. Let me sum up. >>“I need to configure this server and the server needs to know if this value is true or false.” >No, that’s bad. Don’t do that. That’s not a good use for XML. First, the primary case that people
7.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
That arrays point is such a weakness in XML that I rarely see addressed. Arrays and lists are such a common data structure in almost every programming language of the past 40 years that not having first class syntax for representing them is
8.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I agree with this, and also in a complimentary way, but it all seems very non-idiomatic for Go. But I am not a Go expert by any means.
9.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
Which, they didn't. Per the aforementioned hardware safety features. Extremely broad and reliable rule of thumb: hardware safety features > software safety features
10.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I couldn't have guessed that Sheerness had a natural scorpion population and yet somehow it isn't surprising either.
11.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
You reminded me of this [0] fantastic review of Sheerness in Kent. Blackpool is mentioned several times in comparison. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/u2vu5x/i_thi...
12.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
There are lots of hardware features that enable cutoff (such as thermal runaway detection) but that's irrelevant to situations in which the environment has not been prepared for printing. For example, your workshop may be well ventilat
13.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
Oh, so, without experience. Understood.
14.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
It also works where you don't have ssh to tunnel files, which is true for many servers in many professional environments.
15.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
Is that not coming from experience of working at a software company? As I believe you said elsewhere
16.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
The common use I'm referring to is similar to the OP, which is using it as a framework for assessing risk. In particular, aligning a team on the "known unknowns" is critical to building the confidence and alignment needed as
17.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
> The more attention we give AI, the more it will be profitable for sites to use it to gain advertising revenue, and the more money will be given to it's development. Pretty obvious slippery slope fallacy.
18.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
No he didn't, it was needlessly confusing and the fact that it introduced uninformed and unresolved intrigue for him and his wife goes entirely against the point he was trying to make. The reason being that: context is everything. When
19.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I agree and this is a practical method that I've seen work well in several companies I've worked for. However I think there's a bigger problem that contributes to the loss of "spark" that the author strangely didn&#
20.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I work for a company that's fully distributed, and do ~2k miles a year, almost exclusively to visit family. Your halfway-house "build your life around your career" mentality appealed to me in my early 20s when I was on starte
21.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I'm actually British but I was appealing to the er, status quo in this case!
22.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
>256YB drives Ah yes, Yagnibytes.
23.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
That was Donald Rumsfeld!? I always assumed this came from some techie or agile guru given how much it's used as a concept in project planning.
24.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
Whenever I'm sat in a four mile tailback at 6pm, I often look at everyone in the cars around me and, if they make eye contact, I give them a little nod and a smile, as though to say, " We chose this. This was a great choice "
25.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I believe the part about hard coding production data was referring to recreation of the bug, not implementing the solution which the author describes subsequently as "a couple of array functions". There's a fair bit of hand w
26.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
Again you are free to read it how you wish, biases and all.
27.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I called his writing shitty. I like George and have used a lot the tools he's written over the years. I've made similar tools myself. Are you so offended that I have a single critical opinion of him? Because that's a reflecti
28.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
The implication was that his technical knowledge is very good and his writing is not, but you missed that while you were getting angry.
29.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I'm more confused because I thought the first rule of Elm was that you'll never meet anyone that uses it
30.
▲
by
KnobbleMcKnees
3y ago
I don't wish him any ill and hope the same... But it's been over a decade since I started following him and if there is a trajectory to maturity and quality in his writing, I haven't been able to track it. And that's put
More ›