Klathmon

73 ms·

661.
by Klathmon 8y ago
To be fair, I don't think anyone believes that this is the one and only source of the law in all forms. As in if GitHub suddenly started changing it on their own, we wouldn't all throw up our arms and resign to our new GitHub over
662.
by Klathmon 8y ago
The parent commenter specifically said they checked clockspeed was good.
663.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Won't Intel chips down clock in that case?
664.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I believe it's similar with a lot of the Google devices. Last I read, a pretrained ML trigger happens entirely on-device, and if the trigger happens, it sends the previous few seconds to the server that does the real processing to chec
665.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I haven't read into Contributor to see if they are even claiming that in the first place (the homepage doesn't mention anything about it, and I don't feel "tracking" and "ads" are the same thing at all, ev
666.
by Klathmon 8y ago
https://contributor.google.com/v/beta is almost exactly what you describe. It doesn't seem to be growing much though, only having roughly 20 sites it looks like. https://support.google.com/contribu
667.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I was always told to make sure you keep extra of any kind of material like that around. A handful of extra tile, some extra wood flooring, some carpet that we pulled out to replace with wood floor at one point, even some extra molding just
668.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I'm in complete agreement that RTFM is something that you'll have to do, but us humans aren't good at being constantly vigilant. Types are an additional layer on top, that can help provide context and information which is oft
669.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Sure, in that simple case explicit types aren't helping, but take a look at this simple function (it's plain javascript): export const mergeItems = (keyExtractor, oldItems, newItems) => uniqBy(oldItems.concat(newIte
670.
by Klathmon 8y ago
A general rule of thumb I follow is to explicitly type your interfaces, and infer private internals. (I mean "interfaces" not referring to any specific language feature, but to the concept in general).
671.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I know some people in South Carolina whose beach house (on stilts and everything) withstood Irma just fine, however it had to be demolished because the beach had eroded enough that it was basically over the ocean now, and it was infeasible
672.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I know blockchain is a dirty word around here, but this is absolutely an application that can use something like Bitcoin to store hashes of a site on a specific date, giving you the closest thing you can get to "proof" that the si
673.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Yeah, from what I read when I first started riding, there are a few really easy things that can significantly reduce your risk: * Wear a goddamn helmet * Don't drink and ride * Don't speed * Get a bike with ABS
674.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Well sure you shouldn't rely on anything new for core aspects of your application without a plan for what happens if they go away. Especially when the API in question isn't even implemented yet... But that's not how I underst
675.
by Klathmon 8y ago
By that line of thinking relying on OS APIs will be trouble as Microsoft or Apple could remove features at any time.
676.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Congrats to the people at Rocket Lab on another successful launch! I'm so excited about these smaller and cheaper rockets making it practical to send much cheaper smaller payloads payloads into orbit.
677.
by Klathmon 8y ago
They use it for a few different projects: https://github.com/facebook?language=ocaml
678.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Not only that, but the companies first successful orbital launch was only 10 years ago! In those 10 years they went from being literally laughed out of rooms, to being the forefront of the industry. And even now that they are arguably &quot
679.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I don't see that. I know I've "voted defensively" before, and I really don't like having to do it. I want to vote for those that I agree with, I don't want to vote against those who I disagree with. It may seem
680.
by Klathmon 8y ago
It's a solution, not the solution, and I think that's an important distinction to make. Screens could be causing sleeplessness, or it could be that sitting bored without anything to keep your attention is the key to getting t
681.
by Klathmon 8y ago
It's not like they are trying to hide it, the coalition is very open about what they are, a group of advertisers and ad networks that are trying to get rid of bad ads so that people don't install adblockers that block all ads. Thi
682.
by Klathmon 8y ago
They are part of the "Coalition for Better Ads" [1] which, aside from sounding like an evil group from a comic book, is trying to be that kind of group of interested parties. Members include Google, Facebook, and Reuters among man
683.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Protesting like this is always a very fine line, but i'm personally okay with breaking a law if you are doing it for the sole purpose of trying to change that law. That being said, i'm genuinely struggling to think of a situation
684.
by Klathmon 8y ago
it depends on how well engineered the application is, like anything. I've been working on react-native recently, and this is by far the most difficult "framework" (or system, or library, or whatever else you want to call it)
685.
by Klathmon 8y ago
But that's my point, is that I expected MS to stand it up, get it like 50-80% working, then drop it. It's happened a lot of times: * nashorn - started off as a reimplementation of node APIs in java's JS engine, died around 20
686.
by Klathmon 8y ago
>This version also comes with the experimental release of Node-ChakraCore Wow, it looks like Microsoft is really truly supporting this! I have to be honest, when I first saw they were trying to run their engine in node, I thought it woul
687.
by Klathmon 8y ago
According to that table, Helium is 260, and water is 265, and there are a few more under 300. Does that mean that water (in some form) also acts like helium and would be able to get through that seal?
688.
by Klathmon 8y ago
>It dilutes the concept, making it less relevant and useful. Currently I know that I can sell something I make using open source libraries; tomorrow, I won't. I'm not trying to twist your words, but that point has already been
689.
by Klathmon 8y ago
Like all good arguments, this one comes down to semantics! I'm not going to argue about what a word or phrase "should" mean, but I am going to say that I think the FOSS community could benefit from being more open to differen
690.
by Klathmon 8y ago
I get that, but I'm asking why we adhere to that? I'd be more than happy to change the definition of "Open Source" if it means that more companies will participate, as doing so won't entirely rob them of most of the

More ›