Jcampuzano2

7 ms·

61.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
Nowhere in my argument do I contend it may not affect myself. In fact I have basically already accepted its very likely I'll be replaced due to AI in the very near future. Thats just the unfortunate reality of things at the individual
62.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
I wrote in a separate comment elsewhere that I don't really disagree that the current top brass of AI push it as something that would replace people on a much larger degree than most other technology, but that in my opinion the argumen
63.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
I agree was going to comment that yes it does feel slightly different because in most cases technology narrowly targeted specific niches at the time, that when replaced could at least in hindsight be seen to likely benefit the majority at t
64.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
> Why da f*#$ do they have to continue developing a technology which they think will replace droves of people by machines?? There is nothing sexy about it. There is nothing cool about it either. This argument alone doesn't really wo
65.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
I personally have not had good luck with loops due to similar issues as the post author - but if you were to port your flow to "looping" it would be something like: - An automation that periodically checks for PRD's at a give
66.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
Same experience when I worked somewhere using outlook. I exclusively used the web UI because it always ran faster for me, except for a small number of things it couldn't do.
67.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
Well maybe don't run the call center at all, and actually make things fixable yourself without interacting with a human/LLM. Example: At least here in the US plenty of companies still require calling in to cancel. Include that by
68.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
The problem is a problem of choice I believe. When we use AI ourselves via tools like chatbots, harnesses etc. we are mostly actively choosing to do so, and have some control. We can always just decide to stop and do the work ourselves if i
69.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
The companies that use AI the best will be those for which you don't have to tell someone they're using AI. That will be the sign of it being a quality product. If you have to scream, shout, and beg your consumers to use your AI p
70.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
I actually never mentioned anything about actually using the AI tools integrated into Cursor in my post. I think I'd generalize my post more to say the more often somebody reaches for the terminal, in my anecdotal experience the more p
71.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
I know, I actually use it pretty often at work. I agree that its pretty on par with the others.
72.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
Never said I was judging, just making an observation. And to answer - yes by book you would be an outlier. Its just an anecdotal experience.
73.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
I know this is not always true. But the same people who like cursor still are the same people who are less familiar with the terminal. And I don't know what it is but it feels the less familiar you are with a terminal, the less skilled
74.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
The reason is pretty obvious. Anthropic tried to play hardball with the government and now they are under their thumb for scrutiny of any and every little thing they do. That's what this admin is known for. If you do even what a normal
75.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
I've been using Tauri for a while and haven't run into any issues with any of the apps I've written. Admittedly, most of them are fairly small, but the smaller footprint is a big plus in my book. I'm usually only shippin
76.
by Jcampuzano2 4mo ago
Maybe my managers have always sucked or I'm terrible at sharing info or not very chatty with people at work but I've personally always found weekly 1-1's to end up being fairly useless. May just be a person by person thing th
77.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
It literally takes a 2 second Google search of just the two terms Palantir and anthropic to find sources for this and is fairly well known. https://investors.palantir.com/news-details/2024/Anthropic-a... https:&#
78.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
Anthropic literally already works with companies like Palantir and others weaponizing their AI. Those just aren't quite as well known by the general public. They have no values that align with humans prospering.
79.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
How can you say this as if supporting Dario is any better. At the top level of anything there is almost no such thing as a non-asshole. None of them care genuinely about you they just want your money.
80.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
The problem is everything we send that was created from a prompt is not you. If I wanted to read something that wasn't written by another person, you might as well swap out the from field for "Claude" or "gpt-5" or
81.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
Adaptive thinking isn't configurable if you're using 4.7 or higher though, so anybody on modern opus its basically useless. https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config#adaptive-reason... > Opus 4.7 a
82.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
I don't disagree and thats likely the opinion of the vast majority of people. Thats why i say that unions and collective bargaining are most likely to be a net benefit overall. It just hurts competition among those who have an internal
83.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
This is usually one of the arguments made against unions, and I find it an interesting phenomenon. Philosophically unions benefit the majority and are probably a net good on a social construct level. But they are likely a net loss to the to
84.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
OpenAI specifically targeted Academia a lot and gave out a lot of free/unlimited usage to top academics and universities/researchers. They also offer grants you can apply for as a researcher. I'm sure other labs may have this
85.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
I think part of this is due to the fact that the closest competition cheap but comparable intelligence models are all mostly Chinese models. Think what you want but even when hosted in the US, at the enterprise level going all in on that wo
86.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
Not a single person on the Bun team nor Anthropic has yet done anything egregious to market this as anything but a swap to a more memory-safe language with better compiler guarantees. Thus far most of the buzz and marketing has been entirel
87.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
> quite clearly the value they actually get out of it is getting the headline This is entirely disingenuous. Jarred has already made it clear what value they get out of moving off of Zig. Yes they used AI heavily to attempt this goal but
88.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
So many people are fundamentally misunderstanding everything about this rewrite. In fact using the word "rewrite" itself is pretty inaccurate. As has been mentioned the goal was a port so they "could" eventually rewrite
89.
by Jcampuzano2 5mo ago
It's still an impressive achievement that would have taken even the most competent engineers an exponentially longer time to accomplish. I just hope it's noted when this is eventually marketed how much human effort went into desig
90.
by Jcampuzano2 6mo ago
This would have been easy to say if it was the first time it or something similar happened. But there is a clear pattern emerging. There's no reason to turn down the heat when a company of this size and influence is allowed this level

More ›