JasonCannon

9 ms·

31.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Strings are the safest way to hold big numbers in JavaScript due to how JavaScript represents numbers. Also no, infinity is not a number. It's a concept.
32.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Not really, but I was addicted to Reddit and HN is atleast a better use of my time due to being about tech and other interesting content, and less addicting. So here I am.
33.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Not sure why I got downvoted for this. I assume because of the other comment saying that doing this is "cruel" which it isn't. At all. If someone lies and says they know how to develop, can talk about development in depth, bu
34.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
This is his twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/jonschlinkert He definitely voted for trump.
35.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Comparing it against the list of examples given in is-number, this solution does not properly handle numbers represented as strings, and it also recognizes Infinity as a number.
36.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
A lot of those fields still care more about what you can do, rather than what college credentials you have. Learn to do the work, get samples in your portfolio showing you can do the work, maybe blog about it, and apply. Let them decide if
37.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
>2. Interviewing. FAANG can waste 30+ engineering hours on each candidate because of how much money they can burn. Don't do leetcode interviews. Find someone who you think is good, hire them, if they're not good let them go. Do
38.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Checking with someone if they want to engage in small talk is weird and not at all how it should go. You do the right thing by telling someone you'd rather not make small talk right now. If they respond badly that's on them.
39.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
You don't use .net core anymore. You use .net 5 or the recently released .net 6. When you use dotnet new it will generate a .csproj file, in that csproj file it will specify what frameowrk you are targeting. I don't know what exac
40.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Or perhaps Liberalism is inherently oppressive and no amount of reform or change will change that fact.
41.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
The state collapsing does not mean Anarchism is here. Anarchism is more than just no governments. That's what you are either failing to understand or purposely ignoring. Anarchism is itself a style of organization and ideology. Mogadis
42.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Murray Rothbard did it to both high jack left wing fervor and also to convince people that it was radical to give capitalists unfettered power. It's little more than an attempt by capitalists to create a fake opposition that is actuall
43.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Capitalism is itself hierarchical. You have the Capitalist who owns the Capital goods and controls the workers who provide the labour in order to turn a profit all of which is exploited by the capitalist for the capitalist gains. Markets ar
44.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
I recommend Debt the first 5000 years as well as The Democracy Project. Both of which were absolutely fascinating to me. Solidarity forever and rest in power Graeber.
45.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
All Anarchists are left wing. AnCaps aren't anarchists. Anarchism is inherently socialist.
46.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
The ancient mosques? The pyramids of Egypt? The pyramids of South America? The Aztecs built their capital on a lake. The Taj Mahal, Kailasa Temple, any of the temples in ancient Babylon and Mesopotamia, and countless other monuments built a
47.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Really gonna need a source on that claim.
48.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was the first person to use the term Anarchism to describe the political philosophy that we (anarchists) believe in. He was born the same year Thomas Payne died. So while Payne wouldn't have described himself as
49.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Anarchism is not just taking down the current system and saying "No system!" It is itself a system and an ideology around how people rule themselves. We don't seek to destroy, we seek to organize new systems and build that up
50.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Gonna need a source on this one.
51.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Capitalist democracies (no such thing they are all republics) still maintain the power structures that have always existed. The ruling class simply stops calling themselves the aristocracy and start calling themselves representatives and se
52.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Anarchist State. Ruler Anarchist. I don't think you quite grasp what Anarchism is. Anarchism isn't simply the removal of rules and calling it a day. It's about decolonizing our minds and ideologies. It's about restructur
53.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Like I said to the sibling comment, look up the CNT-FAI, the EZLN, the YPG, and the Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine. There is nothing wrong with having the federation create a militia for the purpose of self defense and furthe
54.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
You would own the home you live in or the car you drive. Those would be your personal property. But you cannot own multiple homes that you rent out. Or a fleet of cars that you run a ride share company with. Thats private property and (priv
55.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Thanks for posting this. A lot to reflect on here. I'm a cis white male and while I can't relate to everything said here I definitely feel the "you're a cis white male so shut up and listen" frustration. I'm ma
56.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Not athenian democracy, because that had hierarchy inherent in it. But yes, we believe in Direct Democracy. >Direct democracy might work well for a city state where even poor citizens are independent land owners, One of the principal bel
57.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Then that would be a shitty world to live in. Good thing it isn't true.
58.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
Yeah I hate this idea that real people are rude and shit. No, you're just an asshole. I'm not fake because I make pleasant small talk with people while interacting with them. It's called being a decent person. Assholes aren&#
59.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
>Anarchism without considering the legacy humanity instincts inherited is not realistic and not worth considering. Man, if only in the last 200 years of philosophical work done on Anarchism one of the anarchist philosophers would have st
60.
by JasonCannon 5y ago
It also is about decentralizing power. There would be no one executive being who decides something is or is not legal. But the collective would be able to vote directly on how things should operate. And that includes the ability to punish &

More ›