IntelAMDVia

3 ms·

1.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
Thank you for your responses. Unfortunately I'm not as comfortable using my primary account for responses here, so I will abstain from discussions of a political nature.
2.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
Was the removal from the front page algorithmic or a manual step by moderators? The lack of transparency with the soft censorship is alarming, particularly given YC's financial conflict of interest.
3.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
Moderators: Why was this submission removed from the front page as soon as it started to gain traction? The risk of nationalistic flame wars needs to be weighed against important discussion potential. But the submission is interesting enoug
4.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
To be clear, the Confucius Institute is aimed at teaching students in its hosted nation certain propaganda. Products of the domestic China censored education system also use a lot of whataboutism. The bigger problem is the fact this submiss
5.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
I found lots of links saying US does 'industrial espionage' but no one says this helps US companies. > The U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence said it does collect information about economic and financial matte
6.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
I have heard that was not state sponsored but people memorizing schematics. I am not sure though. I am interested in learning more. China does innovate. But it is a nation sponsoring technology stealing on a huge scale. I don't think U
7.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
I have not read those books. It sounds the CIA pressuring third world nations to do things not in their economic interests. I don't support that. That is bad but different to stealing technology using hidden back doors which China repo
8.
by IntelAMDVia 8y ago
The difference is China uses spyware to steal from anyone who has access to economically valuable information. That's every engineer in the world. US does not seem to steal for economic purposes at all. Well at least not on the same sc