ImJamal

45 ms·

721.
by ImJamal 3y ago
If you don't want that then you could live in California or NY.
722.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Yes until the congress actually does their job and passes a law.
723.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Sanctions sometimes ban providing services to people in countries. Apparently Minecraft requires you to login (a service) to use the game. If the game was completely offline this wouldn't be a problem.
724.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Some of their changes are pushed upstream. Some are put upstream first and then trickle down to Ubuntu. Some remain Ubuntu only.
725.
by ImJamal 3y ago
>Congress hasn't abdicated anything, they've delegated it, and they retain the power to overrule the EPA Maybe the congress should do this with everything. The president can just make any rule he wants. Or maybe congress should
726.
by ImJamal 3y ago
The federal government sets standards like "No child left behind" and gives less funding if a state does not accept them. States don't have the money to not accept the standards so they generally accept them.
727.
by ImJamal 3y ago
The article was a bit vague, do the users enter the data in their profile or were they mining chats or something like that?
728.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Some people consider LGBT+ to be a persecuted minority. They also consider the Palestinians to be a persecuted minority. It is about helping those who are a persecuted minority even if one of the groups wants to kill everybody in the other
729.
by ImJamal 3y ago
They either knew they were going to get fired or thought since they are in the majority position at Google they wouldn't have a punishment.
730.
by ImJamal 3y ago
There was talk about banning / divesting from China well before the current flair up in Israel/Palestine. I don't think it has anything to do with AIPAC.
731.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Eugenics and forced sterilization aren't anti-science. It is quite the opposite in fact. They have a strong basis in science, specifically genetics and psychology. If you think somebody has undesirable genes or will cause a kid to have
732.
by ImJamal 3y ago
It is legally relevant since they can't charge a dead person with a crime?
733.
by ImJamal 3y ago
No it doesn't. This is a parole who is only out of prison because he accepted that cops can search his property at any time. If he doesn't agree to that he can go back to jail and serve out his sentence.
734.
by ImJamal 3y ago
The quote I quoted is literally from Google. The author just repeated the quote. It has nothing to do with the author's potential bias. If HR/PR lied about defacing property it would open them up to a defamation lawsuit. The entir
735.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Just because most people aren't aware of anything doesn't mean something inappropriate didn't happen.
736.
by ImJamal 3y ago
My evidence is the quote I copied from the article. Writing, with the proper markers, on a whiteboard is not defacing property.
737.
by ImJamal 3y ago
China financially supports Chinese companies. You aren't competing in a free market when that happens.
738.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Writing on a whiteboard is not defacing property unless they didn't use the correct markers and stained the board. It seems like there is something more to it than that.
739.
by ImJamal 3y ago
HR was being kind calling it a sit in. From the article: "They took over office spaces, defaced our property, and physically impeded the work of other Googlers". Defacing property is not part of a sit-in.
740.
by ImJamal 3y ago
If one of your employees is going around shooting people would calling the cops on them also be beyond the pale?
741.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Maybe you forgot RT being banned?
742.
by ImJamal 3y ago
>Maybe the publications back then were more intellectually honest and unbiased, but maybe not. Many of the newspapers in the US were open about their biases. They would often have a political party as part of their name. The first newspa
743.
by ImJamal 3y ago
How do you suggest we make life fair? Some things you can make changes to equalize, but how are you going to equalize height or intelligence or something like that?
744.
by ImJamal 3y ago
The word reestablished means that it used to be established but is no longer established. It is now coming back.
745.
by ImJamal 3y ago
It sounds like it used to exist. No longer exists and is now coming back. If it was currently in existence it would say modified.
746.
by ImJamal 3y ago
>The second law is just a straightforward neutering of citizen review boards. It says reestablished. How are they neutering something that doesn't exist?
747.
by ImJamal 3y ago
How certain are we that those 4 people are in fact individuals rather than a group? Or that some of the other mods are not the same person as the 4 individuals?
748.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Remind me who shut down the Stade Nuclear Power Plant in 2003 and the Obrigheim Nuclear Power Plant in 2005.
749.
by ImJamal 3y ago
Don't most of the people involved with research believe humans first evolved in Africa? If so, they presumably migrated north yo Siberia.
750.
by ImJamal 3y ago
I think you know what I am talking about. Actual helmet usage. Wearing a helmet is safer than not wearing one. If you look at the number of auto deaths 100 years ago it is lower than today. You can't use that ad proof that seatbelts ca

More ›