Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ImJamal
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
751.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Since nobody walks around in bubble wrap I don't think there would be any existing cost-benefit analyses. I was using bubble wrap as a joke thing more than an actual suggestion. My point is, just because something would lower the numbe
752.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Maybe, or they are just claiming they report all the articles where the CIA influenced them as a cover.
753.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
The 4th circuit has 100% reversal rating with over 2 cases reviewed.
754.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
>unless otherwise noted I'm not sure why I should trust that they always accurately describe when they listen to the CIA on issues. I don't trust the CIA and I don't trust a board that has a former CIA director as a member
755.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
The CIA and truth don't usually go hand in hand unless the word not is between them. The CIA is known for manipulation, coups, killing, etc not for spreading truth.
756.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
The article mentions NewsGuard rated these outlets. It is important to note that the former CIA director, Michael Hayden, is involved. Maybe NewsGuard is legitimate, but having a CIA director on the board is very weird.
757.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
You were the one who brought up that the rulings of the 5th were slapped down as some sort of argument about the quality of their rulings.
758.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
For anybody interested the 5th isn't the worst court. Here is a summary https://ballotpedia.org/SCOTUS_case_reversal_rates_(2007_-_P...
759.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
It is a nonstory. Somebody who is 30 probably has not had enough time to become a billionaire even if they would by the time they are 40. It just seems like they are trying to make a point, but don't actually state what their point is.
760.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
That is my point. They choose 30 specifically to make a story out of it.
761.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
That is my point. They choose 30 specifically to make a story out of it.
762.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Why are they arbitrary limiting it to under 30? Why not 40 or 50 or all of them? It seems kind of weird to me.
763.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
The North also had twice the soldiers which probably doesn't hurt.
764.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
There are a fair number of people who have no issue with what China did and as such it is fair to ask somebody advocating for the same policy if they support China's method.
765.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
How would you recommend implementing population control?
766.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
>He had that background, but was he really a "technical type."? I think when people talk about technical types they don't mean a programmer or something like that. They mean somebody who is in the actual field, not an acco
767.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
GE has (had) their hands in everything so a chemical engineer is fine for them. I'm not suggesting a chemical engineer would be the most appropriate for Boeing.
768.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Jack Welch was a 'technical' type. He had a PhD in chemical engineering. Just because somebody isn't a bean counter doesn't mean they won't run the company that way.
769.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Is Kazakhstan actually allied with the West? It seems like they are decently friendly with Russia and try to play both sides?
770.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Believe it or not, but a whole lot of people don't like price discrimination and aren't in the top 10%.
771.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
>neonazi and antisemitic are very much not the same The title refers to antisemitic content and the article talks about a neonazi. The article is clearly linking the two. Not to mention, every neonazi is antisemitic. Throughout the artic
772.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
>Nobody said that, RTFA. Perhaps you should read the article. The article says it unless you are going to be pedantic and say neonazi and antisemitic are not the same.. >Twitter’s policies have officially been changed to aid a neo naz
773.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Banning doxing is now antisemitic?
774.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
One person's legitimate speech is another person's misinformation. Look at the lab leak theory for example. It was constantly called misinformation and now is more accepted. Is it misinformation? Maybe, but it is up to debate and
775.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
The pornhub and Uber/Lyft situations seem completely different. You wouldn't be going further, but would be doing something completely different.
776.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
At a minimum they need to detect if the person is in the EU.
777.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Are you suggesting that Minneapolis should ban Uber and Lyft from leaving the city?
778.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
How likely would that be to work? There are often language, cultural, religious, immigration issues, etc between different sides of wars.
779.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Can you use an Android emulator with Lyft and Uber or do they detect that and stop it? Wouldn't be the most convenient thing but might make things easier than forgoing the services.
780.
▲
by
ImJamal
3y ago
Trying to prove something will happen with a SciFi show isn't exactly the best proof. Look at Wall-E for a counter example to Star Trek.
More ›