IIAOPSW

46 ms·

511.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You might be interested to know about mod 2^m -1. Look at these numbers: 32640, 15420, 39321, 43690 In binary they look like: 1111111100000000, 0111100001111000, 0011001100110011, 0101010101010101 How cute. They are like little one bit pr
512.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Personally I go with the recursive definition. Use the trig identity cos(x)^2 + 1 = cos(2x). 2cos(x)^2 - 1 = cos(2x). 2(2cos(x)^2 - 1)^2 - 1 = 2cos(2x)^2 - 1 = cos(4x) 2(2(2cos(x)^2 - 1)^2 - 1)^2 - 1 = 2cos(4x)^2 - 1 = cos(8x)
513.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Here is my rank conjecture. Part of the advantage to working in frequency space as I suggest is because the output is invariant under certain transformations (up to a multiplication by a phase factor e^(i omega)). In the 2d image case, the
514.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
At some point I asked it for a transcript from the trial of the Hamburgular and that triggered the guardrails, It lectured me about misinformation and how the Hamburgular was just a character from a series of ads and that no such criminal p
515.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Has this guy not heard of Matlab? He's acting like the idea of everything as an array is some niche forgotten thing in a long dead language, meanwhile practically every Engineering department is choc o bloc of people who take the &quot
516.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I fully agree that context the semantic content itself primes the listenerrs expectations of the next rabbit. But that sort of language model need not be GPT-level good. It just needs to identify which words/letters are unlikely to be
517.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>a specific vowel could best be represented by floating-point numbers that are culturally chosen somewhat arbitrary by language evolution). Like /ɪ/ might be 0.82 closeness, 0.23 backness, 0.05 roundedness in some language, but
518.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
In retrospect I should have realized the corner I was painting myself here. If I'm right, you just paid bargain basement prices for an algorithm that can replace an expensive 2B parameter ML process. But, if I had offered what the bet
519.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>If it can memorize all possible waveforms across all those languages and how they convert into words in only 2B parameters then I'm incredibly impressed. Well then I don't think you've looked at the topic very deeply. Our
520.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Corollary: even with the proviso it can pay to "pretend assume good faith". Give them enough rope to hang themselves.
521.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>won't be looked on kindly either in many cases. There are countless of other examples; playing my thesis in a public place on speakers 24/7 is also not going to end well for you. Not looked at kindly and carrying the force of
522.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
More like universal speech memorization. Model implies they had some sort of insight, a simplification, an understanding of how natural language works. This is just bragging about the number of parameters they can pull off.
523.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
No. Having the other 20 in-between values doesn't help improve the "accuracy" of the 2 khz wave. An x Khz wave is always an x Khz wave. That is to say the x Khz part of the signal is by definition the part of the signal which
524.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I kept reading expecting there to be some sort of metaphor, a literal thing in your story that they were both working on together. Like show me what old-dude Calvin-ball actually looks like.
525.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I did it because something about the mannerisms openAI impose upon it, the excessive helpfulness, constant apologizing / concern over politeness, extreme aversion to directly conflicting anything you say, all at the same time, its a ty
526.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I've been referring to chatGPT as GPTina, and now days mostly just Tina. Why'd you pick Emma, and would you consider switching to Tina?
527.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You can only "establish legal precedence" when the law is ambiguous and thus in need of interpretation to begin with. Calling OpenAI's data / access thereof "dubious" is fundamentally an opinion you have about
528.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Your wish for a lawsuit misguidedly presupposes they would lose on the grounds of fairness. Being a hypocrite isn't a crime and neither is profiting off of it. Point to any data they trained on that was neither already public domain or
529.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You're talking to the model right now.
530.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Last year I was running a semaphore lamp off my fire escape https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPE8xHSIaKk
531.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I get it. These companies of the past, they were titans of industry. They left their ruins behind everywhere like a lost civilization. An Ozymandias statue a thousand fold. Among the dead in Mt Zion Cemetery is the body of a colossus. A thi
532.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
It can still be "general" outside of those areas, it will just be prone to mistakes of common sense. So to rephrase it all tersely: Sensory grounding isn't needed for general intelligence or for computers to be capable of &qu
533.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Yes, the systems we construct within this reality are obviously not the bottom of the stack because we built the stack. But suppose the trading bots figure out how to manipulate the rounding mechanics of high frequency trading to jerry rig
534.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Squares are physical. Historically exponents were only understood as measurements of the diagonal on a square, a neat trick for architects building something in our physical reality.
535.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>That's obviously not true Yes, that was my point
536.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The "general" in "general intelligence" is when you can hack together a picture of other domains by stitching together objects in your own domain. Our reasoning system only evolved to talk about 3 physical space dimensio
537.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
But how do you determine the basicness level of reality? And how do you know there isn't a layer lower than our own?
538.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Sure there are terminal words at the bottom. Natural language sentences eventually come down to relating some raw physical objects to others. We live in a reality where objects have inherent properties like size and texture and warmth and l
539.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>But I fail to see how an AI whose entire domain of knowledge is limited to board games, or financial trading, would qualify as artificial general intelligence. Let me recast this: >I fail to see how an I whose entire domain of knowle
540.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
No. But with the caveat that it can only truly grasp things that are self contained systems of text. Allow me to give examples: Transit wayfinding: A train service is nothing more than a list of stations it goes to, a station is nothing mor

More ›