It can still be "general" outside of those areas, it will just be prone to mistakes of common sense. So to rephrase it all tersely: Sensory grounding isn't nee

It can still be "general" outside of those areas, it will just be prone to mistakes of common sense. So to rephrase it all tersely: Sensory grounding isn't needed for general intelligence or for computers to be capable of "understanding" (as per the title), but it is needed for that intelligence to have what we consider common sense. But I'm glad I got my point made. Great talk.