Guvante

42 ms·

631.
by Guvante 4y ago
None of the evidence you present here supports your conclusion: 20kb per image is like a jpeg worth of data, so certainly not throwing away anything. A tiny model file without logic as to how you got to it isn't interesting. You could
632.
by Guvante 4y ago
> Legally, diffusion models learn from work rather than copying any specific piece, and copyright does not protect a style or give artists the right to retroactively restrict learning from open content. Unless you are a lawyer you are ju
633.
by Guvante 4y ago
> Do you agree with copyright laws? In their entirety? No of course not. Certainly the duration is ridiculous beyond measure. But the idea of having no protections for your own work seems barbaric. At least for work that requires "w
634.
by Guvante 4y ago
AI art is more akin to uploading a copy of someone's work and claiming it is my own that inspired work. It would be one thing if the AI were actually trained like a human was and created unique artwork based on ideas given to it. The r
635.
by Guvante 4y ago
Build an AI using copyright free work and we can talk. Stealing other's work under the guise of "advancement" isn't futurism...
636.
by Guvante 4y ago
If you use MS Paint to copy three photos you found online you are violating their copyright. Your personal insight into how it is done might provide you your own copyright and exactly how you use the other things might make your usage fair
637.
by Guvante 4y ago
I mean piracy is a thing and if that is your jive then, cool? You aren't exactly making a convincing argument saying that you don't have to pay an artist this way. And honestly if you don't think this style of low effort cont
638.
by Guvante 4y ago
The concept of AI art is fine. The implementation by scraping copyrighted work and claiming that their magic algorithm makes they immune to the consequences is where the complaints are.
639.
by Guvante 4y ago
Why are you dismissing their point because the technology could be used in a different way? It isn't being used as you hypothesized.
640.
by Guvante 4y ago
> someone doesn’t like them AI art is literally working against what Kickstarter was made for. AI art is about putting together the work that artists have done in a way that isn't technically theft (well it might be the law is very
641.
by Guvante 4y ago
First of all this move is enough for me to never subscribe to HBO Max so don't take my defense as positive, just explanatory. > If that were the case, there'd be no reason to remove it If the deep parts of the catalog don'
642.
by Guvante 4y ago
"I wouldn't do that" isn't the bar here. "No one would do that" is. Unless you can claim you haven't seen a huge bet on Jack Shit then that isn't sufficient evidence of cheating.
643.
by Guvante 4y ago
I never claimed it was good play, just that it is believable play. Also the whole counterpoint hinges on not believing she felt she was calling a bluff which she explicitly called her plays as being.
644.
by Guvante 4y ago
There needs to be more evidence of cheating then "no one calls with Jack crap" (they totally do), "she had the better had" (she did not unless she knew the deck which requires way more evidence than presented), "the
645.
by Guvante 4y ago
Nothing you said makes sense in the context of cheating in this game. How could she know only his cards? Or how could she know the rivers without knowing anyone else's cards? It was effectively a coin flip given how many outs he had an
646.
by Guvante 4y ago
Her odds were 47%. To claim she needed to know she was ahead to possibly win makes zero sense. He was behind and needed an out. So many outs existed he was more likely to win but "high card beats almost flush/straight".
647.
by Guvante 4y ago
What evidence is there that she did? Literally half the deck was a win for her in this situation. The presumption that people don't call with JX is a weird one, unless you have never played poker before.
648.
by Guvante 4y ago
I don't but I doubt there is evidence to the contrary either. So any positing requires considering both sides as being the chances current evidence provides. Given bad bets leading to threats of violence is not unheard of presupposing
649.
by Guvante 4y ago
If she pegged him as going for a straight her odds probably weren't bad making the move a decent +EV. And it would also match her banter of "you probably got me".
650.
by Guvante 4y ago
> You'll see that she knows that she doesn't have a 3 I haven't played running it twice but it looked like there was still importance to secrecy before the second river was flipped given the way they were acting. > The
651.
by Guvante 4y ago
> This is in a sense totally factual, and I challenge the blowhards here to like, name one substantive harm someone has experienced from ad ID tracking on an iPhone Building up a huge library of data about you in an unregulated fashion h
652.
by Guvante 4y ago
It is complicated: $6B is supposedly related to nuclear waste from the weapons program which is likely hard to compare to power production sites for a huge number of reasons. Technically there is a $40B fund paid for from taxes on nuclear p
653.
by Guvante 4y ago
I would categorize things as "does someone on the team need to know this": * Why does a key appear on the screen when I push a button on my keyboard: no * How is an HTTPS connection created: generally no * How is the JavaScript li
654.
by Guvante 4y ago
Most commutes are 30 miles round trip at the high end. Given a capacity of 400 miles as was quoted above you would need to forget to plug in for over a week to have any issues. Not having enough electricity to make it to work is akin to not
655.
by Guvante 4y ago
You are ignoring the numbers because they don't support your version of events. A $500,000 home is taxed $12,500 a year or a little over $1,000 per month in New Jersey the state with the highest property tax in the United States. Howev
656.
by Guvante 4y ago
Lets take the example above as being too much money (as "too much" is hard to pin down). In exchange for losing a home due to the $2k payment you will receive $80k. Generally speaking 40 years worth of "I couldn't afford
657.
by Guvante 5y ago
As you can see from this very topic the pros of unions tend to be ignored while the pain of them is repeated. Higher wages tend to be ignored as it is vague. Harder to fire is tainted by police unions protecting cops from their own actions.
658.
by Guvante 5y ago
> So you're saying that people should not be allowed to build log cabins because they don't contribute to your definition of acceptable housing stock? What if someone would prefer to live in a log cabin than commie block apartm
659.
by Guvante 5y ago
On the topic of housing: As long as it is obviously not normal housing I agree. If people want weird bespoke things in the middle of nowhere then that is different. If you are building your cabin an hour from town I think the government get
660.
by Guvante 5y ago
The secondary market makes universal standards generally helpful. As much as everyone says buyer beware you have to beware a lot less when housing and vehicles were built to a certain standard. Having to track down whoever built the house t

More ›