GreedClarifies

12 ms·

91.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
What’s the competing Azure/OpenAI service? Is it Azure OpenAI service (that seems too simple!)?
92.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
OK then don't! That's the magic of the market! People have different values.
93.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Lol, criminal. I do find that Karp sounds like a huckster, but criminal … sad that this got so many upvotes.
94.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Not after burning 40B USD. He had no choice but to present a strong facade. The Apple device looks impressive and the use cases presented seem plausible. It is expensive no doubt, but if they can convince the jet set crowd to wear it then i
95.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
The billions who use their search everyday would likely disagree. The billions who use YouTube per day would likely disagree. The billions who use android would likely disagree. The hundreds of millions who use gmail, or gsuite would disagr
96.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Deepmind shouldn’t be part of a for profit entity. There I said it. They are clearly focused on moving technology forward and helping humanity. That’s great. However, pulling down 1M+ salaries (for L6+ developers) and using hundreds of mill
97.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Meta is moving the state of the art in headsets. It's great to see that the 15-20 billion per year isn't completely wasted. However, its still a headset and so far the vast populace hasn't been interested in putting a headset
98.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
People that are "impacted" by non-competes in California are quickly informed that they are not enforceable. At least in tech.
99.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
That's an interesting way to move the goalposts. You started with a complex macro object and said it's difficult to reassemble. I noted that the reaction is actually simple, this isn't an information problem. This is a techno
100.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
I don't think so. The technology to enable this is being worked on anyway since it is economically very valuable. Its probably the 2nd most valuable technology being worked on today.
101.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
We're not talking about some kind of very complex macro object. We're talking about converting hydrocarbons -> CO2 + water (or whatever if you care) and reversing that reaction (or similar, since we may want something more stab
102.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
We created this problem by using energy and energy is the way back out of the problem. Energy released by burning one barrel of oil: ~6 GJ. Total number of barrels consumed per year: ~100M Total energy per year: 6 * 10^17 J Solar flux on 1
103.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Uhm wow. I was just talking about my feelings on the topic. I'm guessing he has way more data (and knowledge). Better lucky than good! (also, man he's awesome. How does he have such a strong grasp on all of the topics in the fie
104.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
I’m sympathetic to the idea of new types of specialized models to assist in this effort. We’re using our one hammer for all problems. In particular, it jumps out that a “ranking model” (different, I think from current ranking models) to jud
105.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
This path feels correct to me. It feel like what we do as humans and seems like a reasonable way to start to construct "mode 2" thinking. IDK if our current models have enough of "mode 1" to power this system. It's
106.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
It is a little extreme, but AI seems like it will be a powerful tool and will increase the rate of technological progress.
107.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Idk if they have the “right” to violate privacy (or whatever) I think that the US government just does it and they don’t care. It would be great if the US (and Chinese) governments didn’t act in this way (I’m sure the EU would act in the sa
108.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Clickbait title, and it worked!
109.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Preface, most predictions are worthless. 3 years ago would the author have predicted a chat bot that could understand and write language fluently? Ha. I doubt it. My prediction, FWIW (not much): we are very close to AGI (for some definition
110.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
While this is clearly a pathetic lawsuit, I do think it highlights that OpenAI’s status as a non profit is a sham. Likely they adopted the non profit status as a recruiting tool and they should drop it and join the ranks of for profit compa
111.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
But that's fine it can be a year or two behind the state of the art. That's not the point. The point is that there will be alternatives and that will reduce the price in time further increasing the impact of the technology. Ther
112.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Oh my bad! I thought I read that, is it based upon: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15533 (The Stack) ?
113.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
This is amazing work and bravo on to the people working on redpajama. This is fantastic for the world, this means LLMs will not be controlled by a couple of companies with the associated rents. Yes, private LLMs will likely be a couple of y
114.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Looks like vanguard (vmfxx) is offering 4.78 and apple is offering 4.15. That's about 60 bps, it's not world changing, but vmfxx is a better deal but it may be a little more cumbersome for some.
115.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Fantastic and positive vision for the future. Well done Sal!
116.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Brilliant and hopeful. This is a wonderful vision for the future of education.
117.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Really? Tech was predominantly white (as was the US) in the 70s, by the 90s Asians and Indians were over represented. I'll submit this is prima facie evidence that tech was (and is to some degree) highly meritocratic, and more so than
118.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
If they had any sense of humor they would put an "ironic" meme right at the top of their post.
119.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
I don't think he took it away at all.
120.
by GreedClarifies 3y ago
Do you have any idea what you are talking about?

More ›