Gnarl

12 ms·

91.
by Gnarl 6y ago
Literature suggestions for those interested in this fascinating topic: 1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279863242_Oxidative... 2). https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914 3). https:
92.
by Gnarl 6y ago
Ionizing RF not required for DNA damage. Think biology, not oldschool physics & see here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279863242_Oxidative... TLDR; "Analysis of the currently available peer-reviewe
93.
by Gnarl 6y ago
"You can buy the necessary equipment to start a fiber ISP with a credit card" That sounds really interesting. Care to list stuff needed to bootstrap a fiber ISP?
94.
by Gnarl 6y ago
Methinks you need to see this: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914/ Biologically, there's big difference between man-made and natural EMR.
95.
by Gnarl 7y ago
How almost no one understands that simply trading your time as units for money is ridiculous.
96.
by Gnarl 7y ago
"Coding - on software design process" by Jonathan Locke.
97.
by Gnarl 7y ago
"Coding" by Jonathan Locke, on software development in general. Short and surprizing. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12625166-coding---on-sof...
98.
by Gnarl 7y ago
Perhaps you don't appreciate how a review looking at 100 different setups & methods and 93 of those all arriving at the same endpoint (RF leads to oxidative stress) represents FAR stronger evidence than a single study showing the o
99.
by Gnarl 7y ago
Oops, didn't realize 1st paper had been paywalled. Try here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279863242_Oxidative...
100.
by Gnarl 7y ago
and also this: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914
101.
by Gnarl 7y ago
True! Right now telcos loathe being locked in as fixed-price dumb bit-pipes for the content providers, the netflix'es, facebooks & amazon's, who are making all the money. Thus: 5G.
102.
by Gnarl 7y ago
This thread would be much shorter if someone had read this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
103.
5G: The New York Times Gets It Spectacularly Wrong(medium.com)
3 points by Gnarl 7y ago|0 comments
104.
by Gnarl 7y ago
Are you serious?? Bringing up some random statement from a politician about science. Completely irrelevant.
105.
by Gnarl 7y ago
I wouldn't say you need to reject capitalism, just the form of catastrophy captalism that has become so popular.
106.
by Gnarl 7y ago
For health concerns about 5G to be just "Russian disinformation" then Putin would have had to secretly corrupt respected scientific journals like Nature, The Lancet, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine etc. for decades. Why? Beca
107.
by Gnarl 7y ago
Hi! great question. Thanks for asking. I'm actively working to fix the environment by getting people to reduce their use of wireless tech. and lobbying Government to drastically lower the permitted microwave radiation exposure guidel
108.
by Gnarl 8y ago
Pssst... Its the WiFi https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2015.10...
109.
by Gnarl 8y ago
Biological damage from weak non-ionizing radiation is on par with ionizing. The fact that most commenters on HN can't seem to get their heads around, or even bother to research, is that this damage happens via two different mechanisms.
110.
by Gnarl 8y ago
You can buffer your body against some of the damage by increasing your intake of ordinary antioxidants (refs in my other comments on this thread).
111.
by Gnarl 8y ago
If there is a genuine health problem with WiFi exposure, would you want to be the last to know?
112.
by Gnarl 8y ago
"...showing that you don't need to worry about radiation from your cell phone". Dude. Will you please - PLEASE - just read the biological evidence and move on from that outdated (physicists) argument about photon energy. It i
113.
by Gnarl 8y ago
One of the U.S. leading autism experts (Harvard MD) has co-written papers on the plausible link between low-level electromagnetic field exposure and autism spectrum disorders. The key here is also: oxidative stress, brain inflammation and b
114.
by Gnarl 8y ago
Nothing new. This review just dares to aggregate and conclude on other reviews which have established that modulated, polarized, low-level microwave transmissions (like f.x. WiFi) causes effects like significant oxidative cell stress which
115.
by Gnarl 8y ago
Many scientific references collected here: https://ehtrust.org/science/bees-butterflies-wildlife-resear...
116.
by Gnarl 8y ago
Yes - its happening in all wireless societies (hint!).
117.
by Gnarl 8y ago
When those pesticides are gone and the bees are still dying, then they'll have to stop ignoring the effects of microwave radiation on insect life, bees, bats etc.
118.
by Gnarl 9y ago
You, also, need to see this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
119.
by Gnarl 9y ago
I think you urgently need to see this then: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230 (hint: its a indirect effect)
120.
by Gnarl 9y ago
Quote from my #1 ref. below: "Analysis of the currently available peer-reviewed scientific literature reveals molecular effects induced by low-intensity RFR in living cells; this includes significant activation of key pathways generati

More ›