Hi! great question. Thanks for asking. I'm actively working to fix the environment by getting people to reduce their use of wireless tech. and lobbying Governm

Hi! great question. Thanks for asking. I'm actively working to fix the environment by getting people to reduce their use of wireless tech. and lobbying Government to drastically lower the permitted microwave radiation exposure guidelines. How so, you may ask - since creating an "app" and using tech is the default way to "disrupt" or "fix" something cultural/societal today. No offence meant to app creators. I'm a software guy myself. The tech is exiting and developing is fun, but that invisible, odor-free "something" the wireless tech is constantly emitting to facilitate connectivity, is an environmental toxin. Yes, I'm taking about the RF radiation which is a slow acting poison. It negatively impacts cells, insects, plants, animals & humans. This isn't an opinion any longer. The science on this is robust. It would be wise to heed the warnings of a veteran MD and internal medicine professor who gave a crash-course in biological effects of RF radiation to a Michigan committee: https://youtu.be/1Qt5B39LB7c https://youtu.be/1Qt5B39LB7c If you watch the 5 min. clip, keep in mind that its not just one single professor's statement - its a compression of decades of peer-reviewed and published research that's being presented. Physicists and engineers tend to disagree on a basis of simple energy absorbtion/heating mechanics, but that is irrelevant to the possibility of harmful biological effects given how science now clearly shows biological damage at exposure levels far below heating threshold. The "thermal-only" paradigm with non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation is dead, although Big Wireless' entire business hinges on it being valid still. It isn't. Sound advice is to begin divesting in RF wireless industry and offshoots because its going down. Not tomorrow, but soon enough. Even the risk-ready insurance industry jumped ship years ago. Look up "exclusion 32 electromagnetic fields". They've seen the future and they don't want to pay out for the "next asbestos". Big Wireless' is on its own when the lawsuits are won. As natural background radiation, the frequency bands usurped by wireless telecoms were virtually silent during evolution. Now the man-made background levels are extreme in comparison and the effects are showing broadly as mostly neurological problems in human populations, decline in insect biomass, wild animals avoiding areas with transmitters, tree/foliage damage near transmitters etc. As an interesting development, recently in Denmark, a Lawyer concluded, based on existing science & reports, that 5G rollout will most likely damage the natural environment and contravene a number of European natural protection conventions. See more here: https://helbredssikker-telekommunikation.dk/nyheder/LegalOpinion5G https://helbredssikker-telekommunikation.dk/nyheder/LegalOpi... We need another kind of wireless. Not RF/microwave based. Its possible, I'm sure. Thank you for your attention.