Geee

43 ms·

631.
by Geee 4y ago
If you have been following their updates, it looks like that they have finally found the correct approach for FSD and it is improving very quickly. At this rate, it seems that it'll be close to level 5 this year or next year. Video of
632.
by Geee 4y ago
This is quite misleading, as explained in https://twitter.com/BrandonLive/status/1535477873267515393 .
633.
by Geee 4y ago
Yeah, but you can do similar thing with bitcoin. BAT/Brave is cool, but every app having their own currency isn't useful, expect for speculation purposes. It's like having to use different currencies for buying different prod
634.
by Geee 4y ago
Yes, but in a different way. Web3 has a token for each app, and these apps are just marketing vehicles to pump the token, so nothing useful gets built. It's a thoroughly broken model.
635.
by Geee 4y ago
Web5 doesn't have any tokens. That's one of the main reasons why Jack created this. He wants to show that tokens aren't needed for decentralized apps. This is much more focused on creating something useful. You are right. Web
636.
by Geee 4y ago
That's not what libertarianism is about. It is about ideas that maximize freedom for everyone in a society. It is about allowing freedom to others. It's the opposite to narcissist and anti-social. It is about being nice to each ot
637.
by Geee 4y ago
I think this is very close to the truth. Most tech people, like the author of the article, look Bitcoin only from technological perspective. This completely misses the point, because Bitcoin is worse on many purely technical metrics compare
638.
by Geee 4y ago
That's my reading of the situation. But, probably both Elon and Twitter want to cancel. Elon would in principle like to buy, but the timing was unfortunate, and the offered price is now too expensive.
639.
by Geee 4y ago
Dreams are weird. Last night I had an eye surgery, but they did it from the inside, by removing the top half of my skull. Then they attached it with three wing bolts. I was worried that it would fall off, because it was wobbly, and I tried
640.
by Geee 4y ago
I'd never guess that those specific words would be an obstacle for understanding the concept. Biological evolution is usually taught by explaining random mutation and reproduction, and that surviving mutations are passed on to the next
641.
by Geee 4y ago
I mean just the basic concept of survival of the fittest, which doesn't require deep understanding of biology. The same concept also applies to lots of things besides biological evolution.[0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org&#x2
642.
by Geee 4y ago
Fair point. How about animals? It seems that many modern mammals, including primates, evolved and thrived during the Eocene. Most of the world today is too cold for humans living without protection, so I'm not completely buying that it
643.
by Geee 4y ago
That's not likely going to happen. There are many periods in Earth history where co2 levels were way higher than now, and no large-scale desertification events are known. Periods of very high co2 and higher temperatures are known for h
644.
by Geee 4y ago
Agree. Still, most people seem to be under the impression that there's a "tipping point" and then temperatures will spiral into infinity. It's disruptive, but nature and humanity is adaptive. Many species will also thriv
645.
by Geee 4y ago
It's misleading to imply that this is an exponential process, rather than an S-curve. If we look where all the oil came from, we could deduce that by burning it all we would be just going back to similar environment. I.e. the absolute
646.
by Geee 4y ago
What you're saying is wildly untrue. You are redefining words. Trust is completely different thing than valuation in markets. You don't need to trust gold or bitcoin. They are verifiable. Don't trust, verify. Also, the US dol
647.
by Geee 4y ago
You can turn also turn your head and move around in your room, i.e. your whole room could be full of separate displays, or just pieces of code floating in space. It's not just how much you see at a time, but how easily you can switch c
648.
by Geee 4y ago
Just common sense. Watch -> Phone -> Tablet -> Laptop -> Desktop. You'd be least productive on a watch and most productive on a desktop, and adding extra displays would make you even more productive. Each of them has an int
649.
by Geee 4y ago
Their software and hardware are generally crappy, and I don't believe they can deliver anything innovate in a thousand years.
650.
by Geee 4y ago
Productivity is correlated with display size, and VR should be the next step in productivity, because it allows your whole space to become a display and an interface. When paired with powerful hardware and innovative software it should be t
651.
by Geee 4y ago
Why do you think that creating a new coin and trying to sell it is the easiest way to get bitcoin? Most people think that it's not very easy, and buy bitcoin from an exchange.
652.
by Geee 4y ago
All of them are not individuals, and similar power law distribution applies to all kinds of wealth.
653.
by Geee 4y ago
It's quite interesting that economy and economic progress doesn't require rationality, i.e intelligence. Just like in evolution, randomness, copying of successful strategies and survival of the fittest are needed for economic prog
654.
by Geee 4y ago
Good luck trying to sell your coin to bitcoiners.
655.
by Geee 4y ago
Not sure what are you laughing at. It's the nature of hard money, like bitcoin and gold. Their production cost is close to their market value, which means that you can acquire them only by mining or by trade, which both require work. N
656.
by Geee 4y ago
It doesn't concentrate wealth, because it's a zero-sum game. The only way to acquire bitcoin is to be productive and contribute to society. Otherwise, they'll have to spend their bitcoin. Fiat monetary system, on the other ha
657.
by Geee 4y ago
Not bitcoin. You are talking about altcoins or "cryptos" which are all scams. Obviously bitcoin is not resistant to your own stupidity. If you send your bitcoin to a scammer, it's your own fault. However, if you're caref
658.
by Geee 4y ago
You have missed the point of Bitcoin. It's not just a payment network, it's a completely new type of money. It can't be inflated, it can't be taken away from you, and no one can stop anyone from using it. It's the o
659.
by Geee 4y ago
This is just pure evil. There is no "we". It's mind-boggling how some economists have become complete puppets for governments. He is just straight up lying in most of his arguments. Economic inefficiency is a problem of the c
660.
by Geee 4y ago
Some countries will embrace bitcoin, just like some individuals will. Those who embrace it first, will benefit the most. I think this will be the great divide for this century. Countries with hard money standard and free market economy vs.

More ›