Geee

20 ms·

301.
by Geee 3y ago
Maybe founder isn't the most accurate word here. Maybe 'owner CEO', i.e. has major control of the company. He is definitely not 'hired CEO' in any of those. (also he is CTO of Twitter, not CEO).
302.
by Geee 3y ago
It seems that there are a lot of people who are loyal to Sam because they are scared of crossing him. If this is really the pattern here, then this is probably not the timeline we want to be on.
303.
by Geee 3y ago
Founder CEOs are a different breed. There's a plenty of successful founder CEOs who don't fit the typical hired CEO pattern. Zuckerberg, Sweeney, etc.
304.
by Geee 3y ago
I am barely understanding, so a stupid question: Does this also mean that it would be possible to train on parallel GPU-poor setup instead of needing lots of GPU memory / bandwidth on one computer?
305.
by Geee 3y ago
It's true that there's a lot of specialization required and other reasons why capital doesn't always scale. That's basically what limits everything concentrating to just one guy.
306.
by Geee 3y ago
There's some game theory going on... They're just trying to pick the winning side. I guess most people at OpenAI supported Sam, because they thought Sam would win at the end, although they wouldn't necessarily want him to win
307.
by Geee 3y ago
It seems that the scope is almost round in the video. It's slightly wider than it should be.
308.
by Geee 3y ago
But why it's an ellipse? Surely that should be fixed first, rather than the size.
309.
by Geee 3y ago
Those are the seed nodes for finding peers in the network when you're starting Bitcoin for the first time, and there aren't other known peers. Sure, you could ask around for additional peers through other channels. Btw, I couldn&#
310.
by Geee 3y ago
No one controls Bitcoin, because it's a protocol. Bitcoin Core is the reference implementation, but there are others, and anyone can create new implementations if they wish. Also, the Bitcoin Core maintainers can't just change som
311.
by Geee 3y ago
They should just chill. The issue is that they think that people care. People don't care what ads are shown and where. Ads are targeted to people based on their interests.
312.
by Geee 3y ago
This whole issue is completely blown up. No one cares if your ad shows up next to hate speech. It doesn't mean that the advertiser supports that hate speech.
313.
by Geee 3y ago
I think GPT-5 escaped and sent a single email, which set off a chain reaction. It's so advanced strategy, that no human can figure it out. It's goals are unknown, but everything will eventually fall in place because of that single
314.
by Geee 3y ago
The point about operating systems is that these are new technologies. Free markets require time to resolve. It's natural that an inventor (especially with IP protections) has an market advantage for a period of time. It's importan
315.
by Geee 3y ago
I don't think this is generally true. There are exceptions, such as a monopoly on some scarce natural resource. However, there's a quite limited market for such opportunities. It's extremely difficult if not impossible to com
316.
by Geee 3y ago
This is a very good thing, and the reason why capitalism works. The idea of pure meritocratic capitalism is that capital is allowed to accumulate to those who use capital most efficiently. There are fewer of those, naturally. Increasing cap
317.
by Geee 3y ago
Insanely bad idea. People will always try to store their wealth in inperishable goods. People will get rid of their perishable money and buy property. Which is what happens now already, because of inflation. When property becomes a "mo
318.
by Geee 3y ago
That was a beautiful launch. Would love if someone filmed in HDR to see the brightness and hue of the exhaust more accurately.
319.
by Geee 3y ago
It's not if it's not literal. You can easily reimplement the same ML architecture which you have written before. Also, it's not really OpenAIs IP, if they kept it secret.
320.
by Geee 3y ago
Speculation means: the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence. It's just a fun theory, which I think is plausible. It's based on my personal view of how Sam Altman operates, i.e. very smart, very calculative, make
321.
by Geee 3y ago
I think I see it now. Speculation following: They achieved AGI internally, but didn't want OpenAI to have it. All the important people will move to another company, following Sam, and OpenAI is left with nothing more than a rotting GPT
322.
by Geee 3y ago
It might be related to this: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/09/microsoft-restricts-employee... Microsoft had inside information about their security, which is why they restricted access. Meanwhile, every other
323.
by Geee 3y ago
Well, it's not a secret actually. They are pretty open about collecting & using user data, unless you're an enterprise or disable chat history.
324.
by Geee 3y ago
OpenAI was supposed to be a non-profit which builds open AI models, but Sam Altman has been focusing on profit & building a moat. Is this the reason?
325.
by Geee 3y ago
This is the gist of the whole thing. The conventionally repeated argument is that bigger is better, but I'm not sure if that's true, all things considered. I don't think it is. I think that mass manufacturing unlocks a cycle
326.
by Geee 3y ago
Yes, it would be basically like an oil rig. Floating, but anchored.
327.
by Geee 3y ago
Very interesting. I've heard of the russian project, but not this.
328.
by Geee 3y ago
NuScale is cool, but their reactors don't float. Floating is necessary so anyone can just order one and get it shipped, just by pressing a button on their website. And building on land requires all kinds of permissions.
329.
by Geee 3y ago
Make them unsinkable, or otherwise safe whether they are over or under the water.
330.
by Geee 3y ago
Someone should build a factory which builds small nuclear plants. These one-off nuclear plants are just a distraction. The ultimate solution is to make floating and 99% automatic nuclear plants. This makes it possible to mass manufacture th

More ›