Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
GavinMcG
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
60 ms
·
811.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
> Slowly developing, stable respiratory acidosis (as in COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]) may be well tolerated, but patients may have memory loss, sleep disturbances, excessive daytime sleepiness, and personality changes. Si
812.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
If you're breathing both in and out 30 times per minute, you should probably speak to a doctor. There are a number of medical concerns that could be behind that, and rapid (and therefore shallow) breaths can fail to rid the body of car
813.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Forgiveness isn't endorsement of the behavior. And it also doesn't depend on their changing. Maybe they won't change. Forgiveness is when you change, such that you are no longer unduly influenced in your present life by the
814.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
There are situations where you're disempowered, taken advantage of, or abused. Some people inappropriately generalize those experiences, and instead of being (appropriately) aware of the possibility of mistreatment or risk, they exp
815.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
But does what I'm saying also happen? Because if so, you're conflating forgiving with forgetting. This is advocating forgiveness, not forgetfulness.
816.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
You've got to make yourself responsible for your emotional reality, because you're the only one who can consistently influence it. Or at least, it's up to you whether you allow others to influence it. No one denies that peopl
817.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
> If you forgive the abusive partner, the loan shark, the casino, etc, you return to them No? Forgiveness is the letting go of the past. It doesn't mean going back to or repeating the situation. When you heal your broken leg, you do
818.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Because, as the article describes, the books they're reading are extremely formulaic, to the point where the whole book may be made up of identical sentences, except for the final word.
819.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
> Teachers are required to have continuous training. There seems to be a breakdown between research and teacher education that isn't addressed in the article. Absolutely. And actually, the breakdown starts with teaching education,
820.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
I'm not sure how your comment addresses the article, which spent some time explaining research that does tell us what is more and less effective in teaching reading. > Surely there's more than one way you can get something ou
821.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
That's precisely the problem. That describes tools good readers use to understand meaning across a text , but teaching it as a way to recognize words is problematic. > Adams thought this diagram made perfect sense. The research c
822.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Furthermore: > You know tens of thousands of words instantly, on sight. How did you learn to do that? > It happens through a process called "orthographic mapping." This occurs when you pay attention to the details of a writt
823.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Because it's morally wrong to charge someone for a product they already have, and then to cover up what you've done. It's likely also criminal, as fraud is illegal, but even if not the deceit should be something that makes yo
824.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
I'll argue that that should work, on some level. Communication with one's attorney is privileged for a good reason, and under your theory the police can interfere with that whenever they imagine the package you've mailed is
825.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Does exactly what? Given that the discussion is of a utility function for human life, the first assumption a reader should make is that deontology isn't part of the picture: it's incompatible with utility functions from the get
826.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
A "counterexample" like infinite negative value breaks the system so easily that you ought to consider whether it's out of bounds, instead of being so certain that it's a counterexample.
827.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
If the counterexamples are so trivial and obvious, the author must be a complete idiot, right? But of course they're not a complete idiot, so maybe there's another explanation, that you could have arrived at with a dash of chari
828.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Even if the ranger were referring only to the bus, does two search and rescue operations per year not prove the point?
829.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Sure, given that the point is merely to respond to those who claim many absolute allegiances.
830.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
By the original commenter's definition, value pluralism involves having zero , not many , core principles that are absolute. "Absolute" is the key word.
831.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
You do this by including units. 1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3. And here, 1/3x + 1/3y = 2/6(x+y).
832.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
That's what "stalking" means. I sure hope no one's expanding the term to mean "contact tracing".
833.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
"Should" generally gets read as moral, especially when you bring in a comparison to lying, which is clearly a moral issue.
834.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
OP didn't say it was a bad paper. The criticism is that it wasn't something that lived up to its title. It's hardly unreasonable to point that out.
835.
▲
by
GavinMcG
6y ago
Alternatively, you should expect hard-hitting journalism in the "Explanatory Reporting" and "National Reporting" categories, but should expect skewering in the category of "Editorial Cartooning".
836.
▲
by
GavinMcG
7y ago
This Yale Law Journal note is a decent start for this conversation: https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/amazons-antitrust-parado...
837.
▲
by
GavinMcG
7y ago
> average hackernews reader > P50 request latency I for one don't even know what P50 means.
838.
▲
by
GavinMcG
7y ago
This isn't an answer to the question.
839.
▲
by
GavinMcG
7y ago
And, I'd add, gives to them specifically to be dismissive and to imply that the out group is failing to (or maybe isn't able to) understand things with the special insight the in-group has.
840.
▲
by
GavinMcG
7y ago
I'm curious what you mean by "inherently insulting". Do you think there are words that are insulting "inherently" whereas there are other words that are only contingently insulting? I ask because it seems to me ther
More ›