Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
GVIrish
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
62 ms
·
541.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Bloomberg's article title is really confusing here. It should say "Japanese Carmakers are Learning Tech Talent Doesn't Come Cheap". It's not at all surprising and is part of Japan's overall difficulty in attra
542.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
I think parent post is downplaying things a bit, but I'd take the risk of 100k people bring displaced by a nuclear accident over 100's of millions of people being displaced by climate change.
543.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Here's the thing though, Trump didn't get appreciably more voter turnout than Mitt Romney. Hillary on the other hand, got a lot less Democratic voters to turn out than Obama did. We don't know how much damage Comey's ac
544.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
One type of port that requires most professionals to buy a bunch of dongles. That's not more useful, that's a hassle. Macbooks have had available SSD's for awhile. When it comes down to it, a bunch of sacrifices were made to
545.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
It's certainly possible that multiple US intel and law enforcement agencies were incorrect in their analysis. The US intelligence community has a high degree of confidence on this one, but you never really know unless you can see the
546.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
No, there is no evidence of that. What is clear is that 'someone' provided illegally obtained materials to Wikileaks, and all indications are that it was Russia. Russia chose to provide information that was damaging to Hillary C
547.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
The right certainly would've complained about a coverup if Comey hadn't said anything about the additional emails before the election. It was still a gross breach in protocol and wholly inappropriate. As a rule the FBI simply doe
548.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
> Tax cuts for all working people. Let people decide what to do with their own money (spend, save, donate, etc.). The bigger the government, the smaller the individual. Tax cuts are all well and good in a vacuum, but how are we realistic
549.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
And the new CEO requires an even bigger golden parachute in the likely event of his/her failure.
550.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
> I do not see how banning assault weapons is a "crap" solution. Sure, other guns may still be available but at least it's something. This is exactly parent post's point. Something must be done, even if it is going
551.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
> ...but a lot of the backlash is coming from long-time Apple users such as myself, who feel that Apple is no longer making computers for us. And you know what? That's perfectly fine, they're a business and are catering to the
552.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Unifying to one standard port is kind of cool, except for the fact that not even Apple's other devices use that type of connection and users will have to buy dongles for almost everything. That represents a concrete step backwards in
553.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Sure you can't please everybody. But you can certainly displease most of the people who buy your products. Not saying the ports is a dealbreaker, just that it makes things more inconvenient for probably the majority of users, with lit
554.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Yeah so now you have to carry some sort of multi-adapter in addition to your ultra clean laptop. > It also doesn't have a floppy drive or an IBM serial port. So how long do you think until cameras stop requiring a SD card? How long
555.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Or break the project out into phases/sprints. That way if the customer wants to increase scope it changes the price of the next phase, rather than having to renegotiate the entire deal. It also gives both parties some concrete decisi
556.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Problem is that so few people would be wearing dazzle makeup that the act of wearing dazzle makeup would get you more government attention instead of less.
557.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
The problem being pointed to here is that it's not just official government accounts being hacked here. Private accounts of private citizens are being hacked for political gain. Should everyone who ever worked for the government have
558.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
> Hillary clinton is not in jail Ugh not this again. Hillary is not in jail because her actions did not rise to the level of criminal prosecution. Look at General Petraeus. He willfully gave highly classified material to his mistress.
559.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Well the head of the Community Banking division should definitely have known. But she's being allowed to retire with her full financial package.
560.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
Wells Fargo was touting its new account metrics to investors in addition to the typical revenue numbers. The idea being that if Wells Fargo is gaining that many new customers and new accounts, it would lead to a lot more revenue in the fut
561.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
I don't have time to research everyone you posted but Azealia Banks got banned because she directed a profane, racist, and homophobic rant against Zayn Malik of One Direction. Maybe it's not that Twitter is targeting Trump support
562.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
This. And really, it's the same problem in elected government too. Often times the people who desire power the most are the last ones that should have it. People who might actually make great leaders (or at least would not be tyrant
563.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
This is extremely dangerous tech in the hands of any law enforcement or government agency. We've already seen multiple cases of police in the US destroying video evidence, disabling dashcams, and deleting videos from people's cel
564.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
I would agree that Windows is nowhere near being on life support but I do think that the size of the desktop OS market is shrinking and that in the future we may see a lot more home computer users move to tablet only or something like a Chr
565.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
I think the need for rails is probably the deal breaker. You'd have to repave 2 lanes of asphalt to add the tracks, so it would be very expensive compared to buses and might even approach the cost of light rail. The height issue just
566.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
> it certainly shows that you dispute the right of the person to say what he had to say - so my point stands. You're reading stuff that simply is not there. Nowhere did I say that someone did not have the right to free speech, and
567.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
No, it just means that you can't control how something will be received and that sometimes people are going to have an negative emotional response to something benign or well-intended. Now, whether someone should change their behavior
568.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
> More and more we live in a culture where people think it's their right to feel offended for anyone saying anything that makes them fell that way to just be shut up by someone (some faculty department for instance). Um, it is someo
569.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
The point isn't that most poor people work 2 jobs or whatever, the point is that there are plenty of poor people that work very hard but don't get ahead. Someone born into wealth who even puts in half the effort of a single mothe
570.
▲
by
GVIrish
10y ago
> In the political/economic world, I see poor people refusing to engage in personal responsibility (i.e. having children out of wedlock, doing drugs, smoking, eating badly and not exercising, refusing to work) while the rich do the
More ›