Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
FDSGSG
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
271.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Why does this get downvoted? Does there exist a reasonable counterargument to this? I'd really like to hear it.
272.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Maybe you should consider that we no longer live in the period in which those books were written? How religion emerged has nothing to do with how things should be in secular societies today. It could not matter less that the advice given in
273.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
So what? The scale will be slashed. If you ban the sales of such meat, the business will be in a really tough spot.
274.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Garry's mod is, for example.
275.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Where does the article or the book mention "Rollercoaster Tycoon"? That seems to be something you came up with yourself.
276.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
This might be obvious, but despite what the article claims those children didn't "literally die for want of touch". This is not a real thing that happens.
277.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
> maybe because a significant subset of HN audience consists of outliers like Robbe himself and empathize with folks like him easily. I am one of those people. I knew YUI as a kid, I logged into those KPN computers too. I'd always t
278.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
I recall him playing Garry's mod, that could definitely fit the bill.
279.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Samsung can remotely deactivate Samsung phones? Wow, shocking . Wait, this actually has been normal since Apple introduced the Activation Lock in 2013.
280.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>I was saying that to dismiss any consideration of life and death situations because any deaths would be on the people not paying is fucked up. Do you not think that it is possible to twist almost anything into a life or death situation?
281.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Is not donating malaria nets to poor africans more or less defensible than choosing to sell them phones which deactivate when unpaid? You seem to be suggesting that it would be fucked up to not donate these phones to the poor people who a
282.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
If everyone saw things like you, there would probably not be nearly as many poor people with phones. It is these very consequences (repo, deactivation) that make it possible for these phones to be offered at affordable prices. Sadly we don&
283.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>the coin which provides the most liquidity in the market is an obvious scam. But what does that actually imply? What's the scam? This isn't a black and white thing. Tether might not have sufficient assets to be able to redeem
284.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>but this is a serious allegation Haha, no. Even if entirely true, it's really not a serious allegation.
285.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>Hell, I can even choose never to use the Nintendo store, and just purchase plain cardridges. Do you really think that Nintendo doesn't get their cut on plain cartridges?
286.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
It's not insane, there's simply no reason for why Apple shouldn't get their cut.
287.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Are you sure that such an offence wouldn't be so absurdly unspecific that almost anyone could end up being tried under it?
288.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Which crimes do you think the "relevant people" should be imprisoned for?
289.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
But since it's natural to react in such a way, who's to say that what you're suggesting wouldn't be more than the full consequences? Just as we have lawyers in court, why shouldn't facebook get to say their side?
290.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
How do you define "full consequences"?
291.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
> that is their gimmick It's not. > That is the only way they can “innovate” — or so they have always claimed. They haven't.
292.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>Stolen property. If you steal property, you must report its fair market value in your income in the year you steal it unless you return it to its rightful owner in the same year . :)
293.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
There's no insult, implied or otherwise. You just don't seem to understand the dynamics of this situation.
294.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
> escalated the situation This was definitely the goal. > leverage to go after Anonymous This doesn't make any sense.
295.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
Right now that might be the case, but epik has a long history which predates that reputation. Most of their customers are probably from before they were associated with the "vile" stuff.
296.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>Is this one of the most brutal hacks in recent history? No, not really. Epik can probably continue with their business relatively unscathed. This isn't going to straight up eviscerate the company like some ransomware attacks we
297.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>I have a singular request - so Wireguard is unusable in any high security environments with compliance requirements - because it doesnt support any 2-factor auth out of the box. >We get rejected on stuff like PCI-DSS because the stan
298.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
From 2012, not super old. Bitcoin existed since 2019.
299.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
I think every single new car from the past decade requires proprietary software to reset all the anti-theft features which would block you from changing the engine or ECU. Some manufacturers are more willing to share this software than othe
300.
▲
by
FDSGSG
5y ago
>What happens when the popular politics change? Either you're happy with them, or go to war. This isn't really a new problem.
More ›