5 ms·
How do you define "full consequences"?
by FDSGSG 5y ago
How do you define "full consequences"?
- sekh60 5y agoCorporate death penalty plus prison time for relevant people. How wide to cast the net would have to be worked out.
- spectramax 5y agoI thought we, the liberals, are mostly aligned that non-violent climes should not be punishable by prison time.
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 5y agoI have never seen a stat or survey that suggests that.
- spectramax 5y agoThat's been my general observation. I see the following hypocrisy: Murderers and violent crimes should require rehabilitation, better lives in the prison and discussion here tends to be more around pro-forgiveness ideology; whilst I also see liberals suggesting that politicians and corporate leaders should be punished by prison terms. Apart from my own observation, non-punishment of non-violent crimes is a cornerstone of liberal criminal justice reform (Prop 57, 20, etc.).
- matheusmoreira 5y agoWhatever would have happened had their PR department not intervened.
- FDSGSG 5y agoBut since it's natural to react in such a way, who's to say that what you're suggesting wouldn't be more than the full consequences? Just as we have lawyers in court, why shouldn't facebook get to say their side? Artificially limiting their ability to justify their actions doesn't seem reasonable.