EvilEy3

18 ms·

121.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
I still don't see how is it my problem?
122.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Who cares, they're poor lolz, save animal lives. /s
123.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Another question is, how many humans are you willing to sacrifice to save your wife? Your child? Is your child worth a specific number of human lives, in your eyes? And what is that number? As much as it is necessary.
124.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
How is that immoral if I want tasty meat?
125.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Speak for yourself bud. We only have one life, and it is not for you to decide what other person should eat based on your moralist principles.
126.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Lmao, SV will know first hand what it means "don't play with fire". They thought they had another US, well they helped create another China. When US will learn that only Europe can be considered their ally in this world?
127.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
At the cost of a few people unable to text on their Uber drive? Maybe you mean millions of people who are using public transport, trains, planes, bicycles?
128.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Not all use cases require reliable data storage and it is ok lose few seconds of data. Think simple discussion forums, internal chat applications. That is definitely not ok. I'd be really pissed as a user if I wrote a huge comment
129.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
You're listing car and dog like it's some kind of requirement. I couldn't be less happy to live in a society that has less dogs and less cars.
130.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
It's time to break shitty "sign up" websites.
131.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Of course not, meme currency will do that! Look how much good did it bring, all those GPU shortages, all the wasted electricity.
132.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
They don't need sizeable number of countries. Only one major one.
133.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Code is worthless on it's own.
134.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
It is more restricted because it has less features, it's not necessarily better.
135.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
I seriously doubt that. Mobile platforms and web would be moving towards "decade old desktop frameworks" if those were superior.
136.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Because muh libc and it's not using some obscure barely working DE.
137.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Maybe their developers were actually more efficient being WFH Definitely! You can't come up with something like that in the office, literally impossible.
138.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
This kind of pragmatism is what saves us from pointless discussions.
139.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Fancy! I don't understand who would in their right mind, except for web devs, prefer this to Kotlin + Compose.
140.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Deal with what? It just looks like a cheap knockoff. Abibas of smartphones.
141.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
I don't need nuanced and varied conversations. I don't care about @JohnSmith's political stance or what pizza he likes.
142.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Just because you don't like cult around it, doesn't mean you have downplay V8. No, it's not just another interpreter/compiler. V8 is an incredible feat of engineering.
143.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Why is this downvoted?
144.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Nice! How's Kotlin in general for machine learning/deep learning?
145.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> It's too easy to write off a potential solution as difficult or impossible - but why not adopt this attitude, and at least try? You forgot the part where dude in question is a programming Jesus.
146.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> - Bluetooth issues Aren't they rewriting this thing in Rust? > - Camera is hit and miss, even after the renewed API Give it time. CameraX is already vastly better than what we had before. > - Apps randomly killed on the back
147.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
They should've just let Samsung design the rest of Android. A lot of corporate bull without any tangible result.
148.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
You just listed 5 unrelated teams that have nothing in common. What's you point?
149.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Really nice tip. I also struggle with this. Will try to use it.
150.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
$200 is a tough sell vs $100 Android phone if Android does what you need.

More ›