EvilEy3

18 ms·

151.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Good luck living in Siberia.
152.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Name one. Crypto is one huge scam and pyramid. Period.
153.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Because you don't want your application to become potato on each network hiccup?
154.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Your words not mine. Re-read all of my responses without your blind hatred for what they did. All I am asking for is to give them the benefit of the doubt that they did their research and made a good decision. Of course it's clear
155.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Nope, on Android you'll have to interface with native toolkit anyway. Even if you write everything in C. Just follow the platform instead of fighting it.
156.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Yea so your react native is dead argument is bs. How so? >You clarified it later saying you meant for complex projects but in another comment you claim that they're just a crypto dashboard. Do I really need to chew everything f
157.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
On mobile?
158.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Name one where it doesn't work.
159.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Are FAANG companies the median for tech salaries? If that's the case most companies are doomed. FAANG salary is the median for good developer salary, yes. After all, why would you work for less if you're good enough? > Eve
160.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> You implied they pay their employees very little No implied. I stated it directly. Pay shit and get shit. > that they didn't do their research before making the switch and called the whole thing an "atrocity" which is
161.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Presumptuous is to think that their decision is impeccable and that I don't know shit when you have no idea who I am and what I do.
162.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
This is the error that most web devs make. Their definition of fine is so low, that they can't comprehend reasoning why web tech is inferior on mobile.
163.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> I'm confused - is this meant to be a disbelief of the survey? "quickly followed by"? Are we seeing the same thing? Did you see the %s? It is significantly lower. Of course there are Xamarin and Cordova developers still.
164.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Compose is literally React. It has different execution model, but the same programming model. Maybe you should first read about subject before arguing for the sake of arguing? https://speakerdeck.com/lelandrichardson/re
165.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Their CTO did no due diligence before making such an important transition. He certainly didn't do enough of it, right. They have traded long term prospects for short one. In the long run you'll have more issues with React Nat
166.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
You seem to be missing my point. Compose and SwiftUI are React of mobile world. React certainly stood the test of time.
167.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> All your comments are so vicious with no backing. I literally listed my experience with the app. And I didn't even create account yet. > How does this even track? They had to retrain their engineers. To leverage Web developers,
168.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
I don't see shortage complaints from FAANG companies.
169.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Try to create account, input some gibberish, see "something went wrong" dialog and close it. And define "fine" first. If you mean that it works, sure. But it works slower than truly native application, like Telegram.
170.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> It's still the most actively developed ecosystem for cross platform apps. Don't believe me? See https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2020 Riiiight, and quickly followed by Xamarin and Cordova. Lol
171.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Every 5 or so years there's an "important" transition happening. Name at least one change in Android SDK that can come close to revolution that is Compose. And same for iOS/Mac and SwiftUI. Compose and SwiftUI are d
172.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but Jobs was the one who created this system. Steve wanted to control EVERY aspect of the ecosystem.
173.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Just when there are two arguably most important migrations in mobile world happening(Compose and SwiftUI), they decided to migrate to inferior tech.
174.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
You know what is dismissive? Switching to a lowest common denominator and offer subpar experience. This is what happens when you offer React Natives to users. They dismissed advancements in native development and they'll pay the price
175.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Android performance is garbage. Source: just downloaded app.
176.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Better than what?
177.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
No, they didn't address anything. They only said that it didn't work for Airbnb because it wasn't greenfield. The real reason it doesn't work out, is because React Native is a dumpster fire. If you really want to go cros
178.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> They had a much harder time hiring mobile developers than web developers, and per-person productivity was also lower That's what happens when you pay peanuts.
179.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Hot reloading either barely works or not at all, load up times increase exponentially, It works like this even on hello world apps. The only platform where Hot Reload works reliably on mobile is Flutter.
180.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
What an attrocity. You could've just said that you no longer want to invest in mobile talent. Just opened Coinbase Android app: * Overall slow * Jank in transitions * When dialog pops up and you close it, there's a dangling shadow

More ›