EpicEng

36 ms·

361.
by EpicEng 7y ago
What is your definition of "deals in medical insurance" exactly?
362.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Yeah, but that only tends to work in favor of the company. Try telling them you're salary, so you'll only be working 25-35 hours / week. Even if you get your work done and don't have a 'butt needs to be in the seat&
363.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Aside from that claim being trivially proven false[1], I worked in biotech for more than a decade and this is just wrong. [1]: https://www.healthit.gov/faq/who-must-follow-hipaa
364.
by EpicEng 7y ago
...darn it. I think I have to leave it that way now. Can I blame my phone? Yeah, I'm gonna blame my phone.
365.
by EpicEng 7y ago
No it's not, and hitting the brakes isn't "full control". Honestly, how long do you think it would take you to hit the breaks if something jumped out at you? It would be almost instant. Edit: ok, I was just making a bit
366.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Oh, that's not being fair; they checked in a fix after all! /* issue 84646282 */ sleep(60 * 1000)
367.
by EpicEng 7y ago
> I don't think however that 1.2s is a bad reaction time for a complex situation. 1.2 seconds after hitting a predestrian. That's a pretty poor reaction time. Typically you want to apply the breaks before you come into cont
368.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>From Q3 results, it sounded like the company was profitable just on ride-sharing itself and was losing a ton of money on eats + cargo + autonomous vehicles R&D. Only if goofy non-GAAP accounting is the standard (it's not).
369.
by EpicEng 7y ago
A... "rep"... is a company... "rep"resentative. I don't imagine the GP is saying he's going to call the rep nasty names, but it's good to let them know why he's taking his business elsewhere.
370.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Then we agree; hours worked in a job like that directly correlates to production or a butt in the seat is required at all times.
371.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Of course people need to be present or available for emergency situations, I think everyone understands that.
372.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>There's an easy solution when workers are required to be present... don't make all the employees work at the same time. Need more hours of productivity? Hire more people. And now you've increased overhead and labor costs
373.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Yes, for years. It has nothing to do with hard or easy; the business doesn't function without you there. Comparing that to a job like ours makes no sense. Hours worked is directly correlated with output, unlike engineering.
374.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Many jobs are "warming a chair". Pretty much all of retail and service jobs. In manufacturing you will absolutely lose productivity if you shave a day off of the schedule.
375.
by EpicEng 7y ago
That literally almost no one knows how to use and clicks ok anyway.
376.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Yeah that was a bit much, he deserves to pay.
377.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Yeah, I'd be fine with that. He doesn't come off as a jerk to me, but at least it's something I can understand. I just don't get how he could the word "toxic" could apply to him.
378.
by EpicEng 7y ago
The word "toxic" has lost all meaning as applied to an individual.
379.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>we're subject to American censorship policies. Tumblr / Facebook / YouTube being most notable in their filtering of LGBT content and suspending accounts of LGBT users, because of the American governments stance on human s
380.
by EpicEng 7y ago
On a whim I responded to a recruiter last week about a job. The first step was an online coding challenge. The company wanted a "Java developer", and I told the recruiter I have never used Java regularly, but given my experience s
381.
by EpicEng 7y ago
And Blizz just can't stop stepping in it. https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/9488/wow-community-feel... Before people chime in with "but they technically didn't say that they would add the toy rev
382.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>People make this point every single time this comes up like they've contributed something interesting or new, it's exhausting. Almost as exhausting as people saying it's exhausting. >No one has said the constitution ap
383.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>Yeah, that was a big "IF". But, we will see. If it fails, reverse the ban...I guess. And in the meantime, how many adults have you harmed by taking away an effective smoking cessation device in some naive attempt to protect ch
384.
by EpicEng 7y ago
One other thing about the first amendment is that it doesn't apply to Twitter.
385.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Sources for what exactly? I never said that. What I said is that we have a very well credentialed and highly experienced expert saying A, and then we have random internet guy contradicting him with nothing to support his claims. You think t
386.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>The breaking of the hyoid bone is, in fact, not uncommon in hangings. Nor is the breaking of the cartilage. Nor is hemorrhaging in the face or eyes. You're directly contradicting an expect here. Have any sources to back that up?
387.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Again, please look up definitions for the words 'malicious' and 'morality'.
388.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>Also, if banning vapes helps reduce the rate at which it is getting trendy among teenagers then I fully support it. Yes, because prohibitions have always worked out marvelously, the list of bad things kids get into is small, and won&#x2
389.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>even though the comment shows no malice ...He's literally offering up their personal information on demand. "No malice"? That word doesn't mean what you think it means. Contrary to what you seem to believe, people ca
390.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Oh, so you're not talking about the two ways in which he is objectively wrong in arguing to implement this feature, only that a vendor has the right to add user hostile terms to their ToS. Ok, well you've convinced me! Honestly, w

More ›