Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DoctorOW
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
571.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
I mean why isn't ethical enough? Meat processing is one of the single worst industries for climate change, a surprising amount of the energy production field.
572.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
Is it reasonable to make that assumption? How many ex-Mozilla work on Firefox forks now? How many ex-Google work on Chrome forks? Genuine questions...
573.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
My least favorite Hacker News trope is pretending not to understand what a metaphor is to nitpick an inaccuracy in the literal interpretation.
574.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
The reason you aren't reporting being the victim of a crime is because, given only what you've told me so far, you weren't. You came close sure, but altering the statistics to reflect the emotions of you and your friends woul
575.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
It's not unaccounted.
576.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
You're overcomplicating the methodology. Let's map out a few numbers: A: Number of crime victims armed B: Number of crime victims unarmed C: Victims of ones own gun (who don't already fall into category B) D = B-A+C means D i
577.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
> A pattern you see is that simply _having_ a gun is a massive massive deterrent. I think that's true of having any weapon. So a gun specifically is an unnecessary risk in my opinion.
578.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
I think this is something that's getting better with time. Relationships among younger people is often way more focused on consent and women being able to speak their mind. By no means are you wrong but I do think it's on good tra
579.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
The same is true of being shot with your own gun
580.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
> when looking at data regarding defensive gun use in the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), there was no evidence that gun use reduced the likelihood of injury during attacks on women. That's my perspective too. I'm
581.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
As long as the fire continues to burn, the best firefighters in the world couldn't extinguish it.
582.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
In the first sentence, yeah.
583.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
I think this might be implicitly accusing holocaust deniers of mass reporting and spreading misinformation about the content of the film so it gets pushed up the reporting queue and a Google search returns at least some results that appear
584.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
I think people thought because software cannot really be scarce that it was immune to the flaws of capitalism but that doesn't seem to be the case.
585.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
I like the community here overall but there are far too many discussions tainted by the implicit assumption that if (royal) you see yourself as valuable then others value is synonymous with their similarity to you.
586.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
Does YouTube count? I know it's had it's controversy but it's still miles better than if it hadn't been acquired.
587.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
Also LUT has its limitations... namely I use masks and vignetting all the time. Sure I could add this in my other tools but I can also color correct just fine without an AI 'assisting' me.
588.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
Just a hunch but if you want a less public place to discuss this I have contact info on my profile.
589.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
I'm throwing you a real softball question and you've whiffed it like 5 times in a row. You personally find it ethical to systemically take a stance on the exact same speech in some situations and not in others for what you yoursel
590.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
> in my perfect world (...) cf isn't even in a position to arbitrate speech This is literally the only thing I'm advocating for. I'm a trans woman that openly speaks about my and others' experiences. Trust me when I
591.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
> It raises the barrier of entry to do what they want to do. How so?
592.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
> This isn't a political action group that takes donations and lobbies. It's a site where people's personal information is offered up to anyone who wants it, knowing that many of those people want to do harm with it. The
593.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
> I'm okay if Cloudflare decides to terminate one or two of the biggest, most important harassment sites using their platform per year—doing something is better than doing nothing. I'm sorry, I'd only ever heard of Kiwif
594.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
Bloody hell, I am definitely losing the plot. The reason you feel that way is because a lot of other people do? You have absolutely no rationale or thought process for the disparities between organizations x and y except that people are mad
595.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
True. There is plenty of evidence that meat farming has far greater emissions than plant farming, and that many animals are a leading producer of methane while plants produce oxygen. It is far better to do something because the evidence sup
596.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
I'm genuinely struggling to see how this answers my question. You continually discuss laws when I made it abundantly clear that because laws are, as you put it, Calvinball they are irrelevant to what should be done. > CloudFlare (a
597.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
> They are a company that exists to make money, not a public service beholden to a specific, lawfully mandated social contract. Part of the reason for my position as stated above and throughout the thread. I believe that SPECIFICALLY a
598.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
But see this is where I get tripped up. I don't think laws should dictate morality. So barring the fact that it's the way the law is written in the United States. Why is Illinois morally required to protect speech and Cloudflare,
599.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
Maybe a better one would be privatized health care? What is the standard for who does or doesn't deserve medical care? > I don’t know if this confusion is deliberate to justify certain acts or simply ignorance Also, my guess is ig
600.
▲
by
DoctorOW
4y ago
Also irrelevant. The Nazi bar is a metaphor.
More ›