> They are a company that exists to make money, not a public service beholden to a specific, lawfully mandated social contract. Part of the reason for my posit

> They are a company that exists to make money, not a public service beholden to a specific, lawfully mandated social contract. Part of the reason for my position as stated above and throughout the thread. I believe that SPECIFICALLY at Cloudflare's scale, they have more control than most governments in the realm of speech. Therefore, they are MORALLY (not legally) required to enact the same social contract. I believe any alternative where they break that social contract will have unintentional repercussions for minority groups. To have my position changed, I would need to be convinced those repercussions wouldn't happen in practice.