DannyBee

76 ms·

901.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Again, what does this even mean? Your claim was that they need to "focus their resources" and can't possibly handle multiple large tech cases at once. You still haven't explained what that means, at all. I pointed out t
902.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"Maybe because the regulatory offices aren't built well enough to handle all monopolies at once? " Based on what data is this asserted? As I pointed out elsewhere, the FTC has 780 attorneys, which is about 20x the largest ant
903.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Why, exactly? (It's also not what they are doing, since FTC filed against Amazon)
904.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"I agree, but it could be that they need to focus all their resources to take on google with any chance of success." Why? What does this even mean? I have no idea what it means to "focus all their resources" or why it&#x
905.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Young children to avoid spilling
906.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I'll try to give you a line for those devs: If the developers are running for a UI that helps, or paying for a UI that helps, or paying to run services that help get the money out, then i would say they may be on the hook for charges.
907.
by DannyBee 3y ago
The small issue with reviving Joy Silk is that the Supreme Court is the one that abandoned it. As such, the NLRB, despite what they may want, doesn't actually have the authority to revive it. They are just hoping the facts in this case
908.
by DannyBee 3y ago
There is collusion, of exactly the form described. Just because the collusion happens through voting doesn't make it not collusion.
909.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I'm not sure what the textbook antitrust case they think exists here is, or why, and they literally don't explain. Even funnier, none of the claims in the lawsuit are antitrust claims: Count 1: Breach of Implied Covenant of Good F
910.
by DannyBee 3y ago
So the charges say they charged money to run relayers. Let's ignore that one. In practice, they are being charged with conspiracy, and the conspiracy is mostly about running the website with the UI, not about the smart contracts (as i
911.
by DannyBee 3y ago
You seem to think this matters, but the charges are conspiracy, so it in fact, does not. Their part of the conspiracy was already complete, whether they could do anything or not. If you create parts for a bomb and hand them to someone else
912.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Lawyer here - you may have plausible arguments about things if you just create software without KYC/AML, and you are outside the US or whatever. If you run an actual service without KYC/AML, uh, yeah, you are probably f'd. If
913.
by DannyBee 3y ago
The indictment says they knew they were laundering proceeds of a specific hack, by a specific group. See page 24 Not "they created a tool and it got misused" but instead "these specific criminally sanctioned folks are using o
914.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I would suggest you likely aren't being downvote because you suggest having control, instead, you are being downvoted because you seem to believe that turning off SIP is like a normal thing that people should be doing regularly. I thin
915.
by DannyBee 3y ago
It turns out you get to take responsibility for the downstream consequences of your actions, whether you expected them or others help you or not. That is true in most social, legal, etc settings. (in law, it's known as but-for causatio
916.
by DannyBee 3y ago
This is much more true in the movies than real life. I think you may be seriously underestimating how many lawsuits most companies face, and then lose (or settle). For companies worth 1+billion, they average 300+ simultaneous lawsuits per y
917.
by DannyBee 3y ago
They banned consumer plans that bill at wholesale rates in 2021 after the last time spikes caused massive power bills. https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/HB16/2021
918.
by DannyBee 3y ago
You can't have consumer plans that bill at wholesale rates anymore in texas. After the last time consumers were caught out, they banned it in HB16 in 2021: https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/HB16/2021
919.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Not anymore. Until 2021, consumers could choose providers who bill them at the wholesale rate, as weird as that is. As a result, the last time this happened, consumers were exposed: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02&#x2F
920.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Lawyer here: AA will definitely lose on 3, it won't be close. These are all really weak claims, but: For one, they will have a lot of trouble showing acceptance of a ToS. It's a loser anyway and they'll likely end up with an
921.
by DannyBee 3y ago
They are confused, and seem not to realize that ABIs exist, and often specify alignment requirements. They seem to believe there are just ISA and architecture specs. When you compile for Linux x86_64 ABI, gcc assumes that the stack is 16 by
922.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I seem to remember zvol having known performance issues that were improved greatly in the latest openzfs release. If you read https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11407 It should be in there somewhere. Datas
923.
by DannyBee 3y ago
It was a default judgement. As a result, there was nobody to oppose it and say "this is too high". If actually challenged, it would not stand. The judge can't really reduce it sua sponte in this case, without someone asking
924.
by DannyBee 3y ago
If you just keep your server room at 5 kelvin, you can continuously take advantage of all the latest science has to offer.
925.
by DannyBee 3y ago
It's a default judgement. It will never get paid. They'll chase him around various jurisdictions to try to get it paid and then give up.
926.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Matt glosses over the caselaw and rules.. This case is nowhere near as likely to succeed as he thinks. I'll just quote the FTC itself here: https://www.ftc.gov/advice-guidance/competition-guidance/gui... Fir
927.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"I've been wondering what might move data scientists to Rust" I mean, writ large, the answer is "The availability of the ecosystem they need to use daily in Rust, without having to rewrite it themselves." That is m
928.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Uh? This is just a random request on a bug tracker that someone is triaging the same way they triage all other things?
929.
by DannyBee 3y ago
In the legal realm, I actually like to read blogs, newsletters, podcasts of folks that are often on the other side of an issue or thing than I am. I find it useful to gain perspective/etc. When i have no opinion, i try to find folks on
930.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I’m just a babe in the woods

More ›