I'm not sure what the textbook antitrust case they think exists here is, or why, and they literally don't explain. Even funnier, none of the claims in the laws

I'm not sure what the textbook antitrust case they think exists here is, or why, and they literally don't explain. Even funnier, none of the claims in the lawsuit are antitrust claims: Count 1: Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Count 2: Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations Count 3: Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage Count 4: Negligent Interference with Prospective with Prospective Economic Advantage Count 5: Violations of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, ET SEQ. (17200 is unfair trade practices, which is at least somewhat related to antitrust, but not actually an antitrust claim) I do think you could make out plenty of good antitrust claims against Apple, but this would not be one of them.