Daho0n

59 ms·

631.
by Daho0n 6y ago
As a Dane I can attest that charging infrastructure is most definitely not anywhere near good enough for most people that doesn't have their own parking spot. I just bought a mild-hybrid for the exact reason that charging is impossib
632.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>But surely the majority of those cars have a short commute. That is irrelevant. If you cannot always get a parking spot where you can charge then from time to time you would end up not being able to change when you absolutely need to. I
633.
by Daho0n 6y ago
> Even large cities in North America have no more than a few dozen gas stations (and the UK likely fewer still due to things like London's congestion pricing reducing vehicle count). That's quite funny reading from my chair. I
634.
by Daho0n 6y ago
That is a solved problem in most of the world. I have waited at a gas station at most 5 times in my life and never more than 2-4 minutes. Going to the bathroom or leaving the pump I have never seen anyone do. If I did I would turn off the p
635.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Of course it is easy. You can just pay with a credit card or mobile payment etc. like is already done when paying for parking. Even easier, the charging around where I live you have an account and a card and you just swipe and charge and th
636.
Maker of crowd-sourced coronavirus tracker app sues Apple for iOS store snub(theregister.com)
2 points by Daho0n 6y ago|0 comments
637.
by Daho0n 6y ago
No one is perfect but everyone is better off without a monopoly or mono-culture.
638.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I know I'm in the minority here but in my opinion it is wrong to censor people from these platforms. What should be censored is what they say, not the person. This whole discussion going on everywhere misses a crucial point: Twitter an
639.
by Daho0n 6y ago
That is a bit surprising to me as Denmark in Scandinavia has a reputation for drinking a lot. I looked up the numbers on Wikipedia and "Pure alcohol consumption among persons (age 15+) in litres per capita per year" is 11.4 in Den
640.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I don't know where you read this but it isn't true. >only requires the inspection at regular intervals, not after every repair. This is how it is in Scandinavian countries too by EU law (well, in EU member states, I don't
641.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>that affects the entrepreneurship and innovation. It very likely does but it also saves a lot of peoples lives each day. I mean, not only niche cars, but not having good basic safety in general on the roads. Road fatalities per one bill
642.
by Daho0n 6y ago
If money was the way forward AMD wouldn't be kicking Intel's behind. It is more about the right people and the right culture. IMO Intel doesn't have either and haven't in quote a bit of years. Sure they have very good pe
643.
by Daho0n 6y ago
They already broke one foot and got shot in the other by AMD. Shareholders doesn't like bleeding feet either.
644.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I smell fish. Keller is for those companies that hire him as Steve Jobs was for Apple. I can't think of a single person that is better at righting a CPU company's technical direction. I would even bet a lot on money on that he hav
645.
by Daho0n 6y ago
But Less isn't the same as Not At All.
646.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Maybe I'm missing something or I'm too stupid to understand the article but I don't see why anyone should be allowed to sell a new car with old safety standards for road use? I'm not from the US so maybe it is yet &q
647.
by Daho0n 6y ago
And because most are companies it is dying a slow death.
648.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Because without Firefox we only have the new version of Internet Explorer, now with fancy skins. How Google defines the web standards are how every chromium variant defines it. I get it, not everyone cares about having a web not defined by
649.
by Daho0n 6y ago
If browser diversity is important to you I can't see how you would want to support Brave? No matter how good it is still Chrome you support. If we ended up without Firefox, how do you think Brave users would protest and try to force a
650.
by Daho0n 6y ago
A webbrowser is not something most people can or will switch out easily. Google could any day they want rewrite an API that brave depends on (like one used by adblockers) and it would instantly have caught lots of Barve users with a Bad Bro
651.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Zero dollars is a "fair share". You cannot have free and open and then complain about someone not paying.
652.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Privacy is as much about adding features as removing them. Rewriting APIs that no one else have the manpower to reimplement and update for decades is a bigger problem than adding privacy invasive features. Google could easily make changes b
653.
by Daho0n 6y ago
So what you are basically saying is that consumers should pay according to their ability and consumers that have less money should pay less, correct? Does it only go one way (cheaper) or should rich people also pay more? Seems to me that up
654.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>Dammit dang, downvote abuse is a real issue. Maybe maybe not, but clearly not in this case. It was troll-ish and looking for a fight. Just like your own: >How appropriate, people being told to shut up on a post about people being mad
655.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Not OP but for me it is a deal breaker too. On-top of the privacy issues with most variants Chrome is also the new Internet Explorer, monoculture and forced "standards" and all. Firefox would have to become really bad for me to
656.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Would you like "the linux for the web" to join "the iOS for the web"? Such hyperbole.
657.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Those that care enough about privacy to use TOR and IPFS likely care very much about using a browser made by Google. De-googling Chrome is like removing telemetry from Windows 10 over installing and running Linux: For some it's great w
658.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Please don't.
659.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Which put them in class with such esteemed companies as McAfee and EA Games, both who also need cleaners to clean up crap after install often enough to have cleaners in their soft/malware.
660.
by Daho0n 6y ago
In theory you can remove the folder in Windows. It will leave crap behind but so will deleting .app on mac. Not much of a difference IMO. Both are broken by design.

More ›