Daho0n

65 ms·

661.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>FTFY: in the US No, in lots of places. In Scandinavia Facebook is "for old people". >not everyone shares your opinion I do and everyone I have asked (and maybe informed as part of asking) agrees. The thing is that people ar
662.
by Daho0n 6y ago
> we all know China is the one who make all the troubles with military threat and flying aircraft over Taiwan, day in and day out. As they are fully well allowed to as Taiwan is their own territory. You and I might disagree but out of t
663.
by Daho0n 6y ago
A better product because of government regulation. No business will sell a product that doesn't need to be replaced as often if they aren't forced to do so. The way of the free market is driving us into the ground.
664.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I know it is hip to hate on PRC for lots of reasons but looking at the amazing things happening in China I cannot help but be, well, amazed. Trains, electric buses, some of the safest cars made (all the way back in 2013 Qoros was the safest
665.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Good read. My pet peeve showed its face a few times though, in text like "The west should respond" in discussing alleged Russian cyber-attacks. The West includes Europe. European Russia is 40% of Europe and includes 80% of Russian
666.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I know it is just so easy but to use Facebook for something Free makes it Not Free. You cannot participate without paying the privacy-tax. To me that is much more expensive than buying the stuff they share. I cannot put a price on privacy b
667.
by Daho0n 6y ago
The UK should just get it over with and become a US state.
668.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>They are afraid that eventually, Twitter or Facebook is going to remove their conservative speech Have they (and who are they? The ministers? Every Frenchmen alive?) said this themselves or are you spreading FUD? Censoring speech is &qu
669.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I don't think this should be seen in the light of "open source everything" but more that many see Microsoft doing open source not as part of "being good" but part of their age old "embrace extend extinguish&quo
670.
by Daho0n 6y ago
https://fragilestatesindex.org/ The US has 3.9 in the Human Rights category. It is shared with these countries: Albania, Chile, Ecuador, Poland, Seychelles, South Africa. "Factionalized elites" is common to Jordan
671.
by Daho0n 6y ago
What is going on? In one week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25759932 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25727565 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25803052
672.
by Daho0n 6y ago
This seems to be the opposite of what the article says: >This technology is not going to be employed for digital signage, but instead will be marketed towards e-reader companies who want a high resolution alternative to E INK Kaleido 2
673.
by Daho0n 6y ago
This is just nonsense. They try to claim that ... > Having a minimum wage is almost suicide for small businesses. They cannot hire the workers they need because they are not making enough profit, so those businesses will continue to stay
674.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>thus bypassing the enterprise's ability I think you could change it to read " bypassing the NSA's ability" and find the real reason behind this.
675.
by Daho0n 6y ago
> they defend the home front as well No they clearly do not, not if it makes it any harder for themselves. They include weaknesses and backdoors in products and encryption used by US companies too. That is the direct opposite of "de
676.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Nuremberg set the principle of "just following orders" isn't an excuse. Employed or employee; both are guilty.
677.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Host all their secrets and vulnerabilities on their site and shut down everything else. Prosecute everyone involved. Follow Nuremberg principles set by the US itself (IE. "I followed orders" is not an excuse.)
678.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Only if it doesn't make their own work any harder. NSA prefer weak security for everyone if securing US assets might risk others to be more secure too: >NIST failed to exercise independent judgment but instead deferred extensively t
679.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>So having enough beef to push 1 gigabit NICs is good but planning for the future and adding 2.5 gb or higher is better. I'm using I5-2500K's for firewalls. 1 gigabit hardly moves the CPU usage. I have all NIC offload turned of
680.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Please don't troll.
681.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>and have huge gaps all over They are not supposed to be a tight fit. It is to stop virus/spit going directly into another persons face (or, originally, a wound). They aren't made to actually filter the air. If you want filtere
682.
by Daho0n 6y ago
They did/do, just not in direct payment.
683.
by Daho0n 6y ago
More like got kicked out.
684.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>" Competition authorities traditionally can act only after a company has abused a dominant market position, which has proven a slow and ineffective way of dealing with anticompetitive behavior by digital giants. The new framework w
685.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Exactly. It's very transparent.
686.
by Daho0n 6y ago
You clearly didn't read or understand the post. Tell me, what would the US do in ten years if OPEC became hostile or raised prices? >1 There is no evidence suggesting any war has ever increased US oil access. Saddam wanted to switch
687.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Yet another plus in the book for Sweden. If banks as we know them today does start to die out it's another huge win.
688.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Calender, mail and notes does not belong in a browser by default. It's bloat and attack vectors.
689.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Editorialized is if the title express the posters opinion. It does not. If anything it makes it more clear.
690.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>Texas is now the number 1 oil producer in the world That make no sense at all. It is like stating "the US make the most car tires and hence must have the most rubber trees". The argument is about access to oil reserves. The US

More ›